2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-39244-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Politics of Disablement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
302
0
51

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 513 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
302
0
51
Order By: Relevance
“…While disability scholars have linked the ideological nature of government proposals to this surge of support for the disability movement (Oliver & Barnes, 2012;Roulstone, 2011), the projected impact of these changes on the daily lives of disabled Britons also resonated with the principle that disruptive events and what are perceived as outrageous violations of established ÔrightsÕ can push otherwise disengaged citizens towards direct participation (Woliver, 1993). Assuming that such ÔeverydayÕ concerns constituted the main driver behind this growth in online participation, it was therefore unsurprising to find that the Facebook pages of these high-profile campaigns hosted a considerable number of personal stories (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While disability scholars have linked the ideological nature of government proposals to this surge of support for the disability movement (Oliver & Barnes, 2012;Roulstone, 2011), the projected impact of these changes on the daily lives of disabled Britons also resonated with the principle that disruptive events and what are perceived as outrageous violations of established ÔrightsÕ can push otherwise disengaged citizens towards direct participation (Woliver, 1993). Assuming that such ÔeverydayÕ concerns constituted the main driver behind this growth in online participation, it was therefore unsurprising to find that the Facebook pages of these high-profile campaigns hosted a considerable number of personal stories (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is beyond the scope of this article to describe these changes in detail. It is also not the main purpose of this article to present a detailed analysis of disability policy in England and Portugal and there are many excellent sources of this (Fontes 2011;Oliver and Barnes 2012;Roulstone and Barnes 2005;Roulstone and Prideaux 2012;Pinto and Teixeira 2012;Portugal et al 2010). My purpose here is to focus on how the study's participants were keen to report the impact of state support and benefits (or lack thereof in their lives) since in England, at the time that the empirical work was taking place, the recent government measures regarding state benefits for disabled people were beginning to take shape.…”
Section: Disablism In the Context Of Employment And State Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it was argued that there remained a power imbalance among traditional charities, where an absence of disabled people in leadership positions continued. Whilst there has been a shift in more recent years to secure enhanced participation (Shakespeare, 2006), many have been sceptical of such changes, interpreting them as little more than 'window dressing' (Oliver and Barnes, 2012). Several disability writers would argue that following on from the two campaigns, which provided both a common cause and scope to unite a diverse campaigning alliance, activists in the early 2000s struggled to find unity and build on this momentum.…”
Section: The Changing Parameters Of Disability Activismmentioning
confidence: 99%