1998
DOI: 10.4135/9781483328089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Regional Economies: The U.S. Common Market and the Global Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Territory, scale and regulative structures have taken much of the centre ground of the regionalism debate ( Brenner 2000, Storper 1997, Storper and Salais1997, Hudson 2001. Business interests and investment have thus somewhat margnalised other factors, such as social and political and institutional particularities which are seen merely as subservient to the goal of maximised competitiveness (Scott 1998, Cooke and Morgan 1998, Barnes and Ledebur 1997. But this view is somewhat one sided (see MacLeod 2001, Lovering 1999, as it presumes a standard form of 'good practice' response, driven by institutional-territorial parameters.…”
Section: Regions As a Two-audience Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Territory, scale and regulative structures have taken much of the centre ground of the regionalism debate ( Brenner 2000, Storper 1997, Storper and Salais1997, Hudson 2001. Business interests and investment have thus somewhat margnalised other factors, such as social and political and institutional particularities which are seen merely as subservient to the goal of maximised competitiveness (Scott 1998, Cooke and Morgan 1998, Barnes and Ledebur 1997. But this view is somewhat one sided (see MacLeod 2001, Lovering 1999, as it presumes a standard form of 'good practice' response, driven by institutional-territorial parameters.…”
Section: Regions As a Two-audience Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic analysts have attributed the rise of regions to the changing nature of economic relationships in an information age and, in particular, to the importance of business clusters and networks at a metropolitan level (Sabel, 1988;Saxenian, 1997). For the United States, various studies have demonstrated that the national economy has become less of a unified whole and that regional economic performance is now more heterogeneous within the United States than it was in earlier decades; as a result, the US economy might now be better thought of as a "common market" of regional economies (Barnes and Ledebur, 1998).…”
Section: Regional Competitiveness and Social Cohesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study originally done for the League of Cities, Barnes and Ledebur (1998) examined 78 metropolitan areas in the United States and found that those regions with the widest gap between central city and suburban income in 1980 had the most sluggish job growth during the following decade. Furthermore, the 25 fastest growing set of metropolitan suburbs (identified by change in median household income) all had central cities that also experienced income growth.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of the report argue that we must rethink our basic policy framework regarding the intergovernmental relationship between nation, state, and locality. 8 Relevant to this regional perspective, Central New Mexico, home to Albuquerque and Sandia, is actively involved in an ongoing initiative to strengthen the region's ability to foster development in six industry clusters.…”
Section: National Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%