2014
DOI: 10.17848/9780880994811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Scarlet Letter: Negotiating the U.S. Labor Market with a Criminal Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Harding et al (2018) recently found comparable results using data from Michigan. These estimates strongly support the notion that incarcerating men is likely to have significant effects on their future labor market outcomes (see also Raphael 2014). That said, there is no straightforward way to make inferences from such estimates about the impact of mass incarceration on non-institutionalized male labor-force participation.…”
Section: Mass Incarcerationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Harding et al (2018) recently found comparable results using data from Michigan. These estimates strongly support the notion that incarcerating men is likely to have significant effects on their future labor market outcomes (see also Raphael 2014). That said, there is no straightforward way to make inferences from such estimates about the impact of mass incarceration on non-institutionalized male labor-force participation.…”
Section: Mass Incarcerationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In addition, incarceration may hinder their attainment of job skills compared to those who are free, and lower their productivity through attrition of human capital (Cox ). Empirical evidence also finds that incarceration has a negative effect on earnings (see Grogger ; Western, Kling, and Weiman ; Kling ; Holzer ; Raphael ).…”
Section: Incarceration‐food Insecurity Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incarceration may also limit the upward income mobility of offenders and their families through three mechanisms: stigma, acquiring human capital, and obtaining social capital. Incarceration marks offenders as “untrustworthy” making it difficult for them to find employment (Raphael ). In addition, incarceration may hinder their attainment of job skills compared to those who are free, and lower their productivity through attrition of human capital (Cox ).…”
Section: Incarceration‐food Insecurity Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many education requirements, continuing education courses, and residency requirements restrict entry into occupations that are the most accessible for low-income individuals. Licensure laws often exclude ex-felons-defensible in many professions but not in alland such prohibitions make it extremely diffi cult for ex-offenders to fi nd postprison employment, thereby contributing to America's high recidivism rate (Raphael 2014). On the right, public interest groups such as the Institute for Justice have opposed occupational licensing based on economic liberty arguments, arguing that it reduces economic effi ciency and retards economic growth (Carpenter et al 2012).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%