2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4600-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new sepsis consensus definitions (Sepsis-3): the good, the not-so-bad, and the actually-quite-pretty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight adult (> 18 years) septic shock patients, as defined by The Third International Consensus Definition for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [ 18 ] were enrolled. All patients had to exhibit positive blood cultures or a defined focus of infection (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight adult (> 18 years) septic shock patients, as defined by The Third International Consensus Definition for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [ 18 ] were enrolled. All patients had to exhibit positive blood cultures or a defined focus of infection (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIRS approach has been criticized a lot in the last decade, especially because often, persons with a simple respiratory infection already fulfill two criteria. In 2016, new definitions have been proposed in human medicine, which define sepsis as life-threatening organ failure caused by a dysregulated host response to infection (Singer, 2016). The sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) is the central concept, which evaluates breathing, circulation, liver and kidney function, coagulation and the neurological condition.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, infections can be difficult to confirm. Currently blood cultures processed with standard microbiologic techniques are considered as gold standard for diagnosing infection, but, variety of factors, including prior antibiotic therapy could affect the diagnostic value of blood culture [3]. Bacteremia is identified in only about 30% of patients [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%