2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01776-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Newer, the Better; and May Be Not Good Enough?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also a high agreement (over 85%) between the A-SPECT and CZT-SPECT cameras in terms of the percentages of abnormal study results, ischemia and permanent perfusion defects. Other authors of studies on smaller groups of patients also demonstrated high agreement between results of studies on both discussed types of cameras [11,12,17,28,29].…”
Section: Bouallegue Et Al [26]supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was also a high agreement (over 85%) between the A-SPECT and CZT-SPECT cameras in terms of the percentages of abnormal study results, ischemia and permanent perfusion defects. Other authors of studies on smaller groups of patients also demonstrated high agreement between results of studies on both discussed types of cameras [11,12,17,28,29].…”
Section: Bouallegue Et Al [26]supporting
confidence: 58%
“…As shown by the two previously mentioned meta-analyzes of the results of CZT-SPECT perfusion studies [14,15], the specificity of those studies in detecting coronary artery disease is lower than their sensitivity (69% and 72% vs. 84% and 84%, respectively). The relatively high rate of false-positive results is attributed, as is the case with conventional cameras, to the attenuation of radiation in the patient body, which is largely related to obesity [17]. In order to improve the quality of studies, attempts are made to correct the attenuation.…”
Section: Diagnostic Efficacy Of Czt Camerasmentioning
confidence: 99%