“…As shown by the two previously mentioned meta-analyzes of the results of CZT-SPECT perfusion studies [14,15], the specificity of those studies in detecting coronary artery disease is lower than their sensitivity (69% and 72% vs. 84% and 84%, respectively). The relatively high rate of false-positive results is attributed, as is the case with conventional cameras, to the attenuation of radiation in the patient body, which is largely related to obesity [17]. In order to improve the quality of studies, attempts are made to correct the attenuation.…”