2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2010.00454.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Next Generation of Glioma Biomarkers: MGMT Methylation, BRAF Fusions and IDH1 Mutations

Abstract: For some, glioma biomarkers have been expected to solve common diagnostic problems in routine neuropathology service caused by insufficient material, technical shortcomings or lack of experience. Further, biomarkers should predict patient outcome and direct optimal therapy for the individual patient. Unfortunately, current biomarkers still fall somewhat short of these grand expectations. While there has been some progress, it has generally been slow and in small steps. In this review, the newest set of glioma … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
116
2
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(180 reference statements)
3
116
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, studies that critically compare all assays and systematically analyze which CpG sites best reflect treatment outcome and patient survival are still lacking. 35 In line with previous reports, our results show that patients with a glioma harboring a methylated MGMT promoter generally had a longer overall survival. However, in our series in glioblastoma patients aged 450, MGMT promoter methylation no longer signified survival benefit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Unfortunately, studies that critically compare all assays and systematically analyze which CpG sites best reflect treatment outcome and patient survival are still lacking. 35 In line with previous reports, our results show that patients with a glioma harboring a methylated MGMT promoter generally had a longer overall survival. However, in our series in glioblastoma patients aged 450, MGMT promoter methylation no longer signified survival benefit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…At present, notwithstanding some risk factors have been found, the etiology of glioma is still poorly understood (Kishida et al, 2012, Marumoto et al, 2012. However, as we all know that genetic factors play crucial roles in the occurrence of glioma (Melin, 2011;von Deimling et al, 2011). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.17.7419 Association between the XRCC1 Arg194Trp Polymorphism and Glioma Risk: an Updated Meta-analysis to make early diagnosis, predict patients outcome, or carry out individualized or personalized therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the most relevant molecular markers in diagnostics of diffuse gliomas include 1p/19q deletion, MGMT promoter hypermethylation, and IDH1 mutation (Jansen et al, 2010;Riemenschneider et al, 2010;von Deimling et al, 2011). In this study, we have assessed associations between gene copy number changes by array CGH, methylation status of MGMT gene by pyrosequencing and IDH1 mutation status by immunohistochemistry in different glioma subtypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%