The next generation of knowledge management: Implications for LIS educators and professionals

Liebowìtz, Jay; Paliszkiewicz, Joanna

doi:10.36965/ojakm.2019.7(2)16-28

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Impacts and benefits of KM in educational institutions and libraries (19) (Jemal & Zewdie, 2021); (Kordab et al, 2020); (Dei & Walt, 2020); (Asante & Ngulube, 2020); (Shropshire et al, 2020); (Nair & Munusami, 2020); (Maligat et al, 2020); (Sirorei & Fombad, 2019); (Ahmad et al, 2019); (Liebowitz & Paliszkiewicz, 2019); (Bello, 2018); (Sallam et al, 2018); (Oyedokun et al, 2018); (Dlamini, 2017); (Ahmad, 2017); (Koloniari & Fassoulis, 2017); (Daland, 2016); (Almudallal et al, 2016); (Dhamdhere, 2015). KM models, critical success factors, and challenges for implementing KM in libraries and educational institutions (05) (Rafi et al, 2020a); (Rafi et al, 2020b); (Musangi, et al, 2019); (Koloniari, et al, 2015); (Ologbo & Nor, 2015); KM: an overview KM is a process for gathering, distributing, and effectively using knowledge.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, Library and Information Science (LIS) experts will continue to play a role in KM. Still, for KM to survive and thrive, they must integrate and adapt to the changing organizational contexts (Liebowitz & Paliszkiewicz, 2019). KM in academic institutions could help grow learned-centered knowledge and action learning movement from closed to open knowledge systems and development in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) (Maligat et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The overview of knowledge management for the benefits of service-based value in the university libraries:

Mostofa

2024

edu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is an exclusive chance for university libraries to contribute to the future reimagining of library services. In this regard, the job of KM might be extremely successful. As a result, university libraries may provide excellent user services by utilizing KM. This research is to explore the existing models of Knowledge Management (KM) and how the existing models of KM are implemented at university libraries, to recognize how KM is being implemented at university libraries as reported in earlier research, and the benefits of KM practices for creating service value for libraries. This research was performed following the “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA)” guidelines. The study found that a skilled workforce and expertise are required for effective KM implementation in university libraries. Outdated skills may serve as a starting point for KM in university libraries, but they are insufficient for providing service-based value. There is a need for Library and Information Science (LIS) professionals to develop additional competencies for KM practice in university libraries. Based on the findings and discussion, it can be concluded that all the authors have recognized the importance of KM in libraries. This finding would aid the university libraries and offer current KM knowledge to other libraries. Therefore, this research would be an excellent addition to the application of KM in university libraries.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The overview of knowledge management for the benefits of service-based value in the university libraries:

Mostofa

2024

edu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…KS practices accelerating KS among employees include but not limited to; social networking, mentoring and reverse mentoring, education and training, observation and apprenticeship. As organizations continue their digital transformation, Library and Information Science (LIS) professionals will have to be aware and utilize Artificial Intelligence (AI), data analytics, Internet of Things (IoT), and other skill sets, which will add value to KM in the coming years (Liebowitz and Paliszkiewicz, 2019).…”

Section: Knowledge Sharing Tools and Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Educational Organizations: Literature Review

Bibolli¹,

Širca²,

Mirazchiyski³

2021

MakeLearn 2021: Economy for a New Normal; Digitalisation and Human Relations in Business and Education, Student Papers From The

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to conduct a comprehensive literature research on the impact of knowledge sharing on institutional performance in the public sector, and to explore the impact of knowledge sharing on institutional performance.Study design/methodology/approach: This paper was prepared using the comprehensive literature research (CLR) process. The articles and relevant literature were identified by searching the international scientific databases using the key words. Findings:The literature review revealed that, knowledge sharing in governmental institutions is directly linked to innovation and re-engineering of public services, sound policy decision-making, evidence-based planning and budgeting, accelerated learning across governmental units, overall efficiency and effectiveness in public sector processes and procedures, sustainable development and growth, cost effectiveness and driving up public value to the citizenry.Originality/value: This research is an original piece of work aimed at making a special contribution to the existing body of knowledge on KM and KS practice. It is envisioned to encourage management and leadership in the public sector to embrace KM and KS in order to achieve overall and sustainable improvements in public service delivery

show abstract

“…The classic expression, in the early days of KM, illustrates the focus on the organization's own knowledge and information: "If only Texas Instruments knew what Texas Instruments knew" (Davenport and Prusak, 1998;O'Dell and Jackson, 1998). Liebowitz and Paliszkiewicz (2019) make the point that Borko's (1968) classic definition of "information science," probably not bettered to this date, is so inclusive that there is no functional part of KM that is not included within it.…”

Section: Different Focus Of Km and Lismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are many future directions for LIS to pursue related to KM because of the potential benefits of KM for the LIS profession (Liebowitz and Paliszkiewicz, 2019). In the following, two such directions are identified and will be discussed: the semantic web, and concept identification and retrieval.…”

Section: Future Directions For Lis-related Kmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge management: library and information science writ large

Zhang¹,

Koenig²

2021

A Research Agenda for Knowledge Management and Analytics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In light of the rapidly evolving capabilities of large language models (LLMs), it becomes imperative to develop rigorous domain-specific evaluation benchmarks to accurately assess their capabilities. In response to this need, this paper introduces ArcMMLU, a specialized benchmark tailored for the Library & Information Science (LIS) domain in Chinese. This benchmark aims to measure the knowledge and reasoning capability of LLMs within four key sub-domains: Archival Science, Data Science, Library Science, and Information Science. Following the format of MMLU/CMMLU, we collected over 6,000 high-quality questions for the compilation of ArcMMLU. This extensive compilation can reflect the diverse nature of the LIS domain and offer a robust foundation for LLM evaluation. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that while most mainstream LLMs achieve an average accuracy rate above 50% on ArcMMLU, there remains a notable performance gap, suggesting substantial headroom for refinement in LLM capabilities within the LIS domain. Further analysis explores the effectiveness of few-shot examples on model performance and highlights challenging questions where models consistently underperform, providing valuable insights for targeted improvements. ArcMMLU fills a critical gap in LLM evaluations within the Chinese LIS domain and paves the way for future development of LLMs tailored to this specialized area 1 .

show abstract

The next generation of knowledge management: Implications for LIS educators and professionals

Cited by 7 publications

References 28 publications

The overview of knowledge management for the benefits of service-based value in the university libraries:

The overview of knowledge management for the benefits of service-based value in the university libraries:

Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Educational Organizations: Literature Review

Knowledge management: library and information science writ large

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About