2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The next generation of natural history collections

Abstract: The last 50 years have witnessed rapid changes in the ways that natural history specimens are collected, preserved, analyzed, and documented. Those changes have produced unprecedented access to specimens, images, and data as well as impressive research results in organismal biology. The stage is now set for a new generation of collecting, preserving, analyzing, and integrating biological samples—a generation devoted to interdisciplinary research into complex biological interactions and processes. Next-generati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Collections personnel are increasingly interested in facilitating such research; some are already collaborating with public health agencies to respond to emerging infectious diseases (DiEuliis et al . ; Schindel and Cook ), while others are using archival samples to study long‐term change in human diseases (Emery et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collections personnel are increasingly interested in facilitating such research; some are already collaborating with public health agencies to respond to emerging infectious diseases (DiEuliis et al . ; Schindel and Cook ), while others are using archival samples to study long‐term change in human diseases (Emery et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major changes to plant collection practices in recent decades include the routine inclusion of geographic coordinates with the advent of GPS technologies and, to a lesser extent, tissue sampling for DNA analyses. Therefore, an open re-evaluation of collection methods is needed to maximize future use of herbarium data (Heberling and Isaac, 2017;Morrison et al, 2017;Schindel and Cook, 2018).Botanists have long been aware of the potential shortcomings of herbarium specimens and the information that can be derived from them. Fogg (1940) noted that many specimens are of limited value due to poor metadata (e.g., unknown collection dates, vague localities), sparse field notes, or insufficient material to permit verifiable PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Innovative approaches to specimen collection and curation are needed to maximize the utility of natural history collections in a new era of data use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baselines, against which to assess environmental stability and perturbation, are only as good as the accuracy of the species identifications, the depth of associated biodiversity informatics, the holistic approach to communitylevel collections (Schindel andCook, 2018, Galbreath et al, 2019), and authoritative archived specimens (with integrated data) that describe an ecological assemblage in space and time (e.g., Brooks et al, 2014;Cook et al, 2016;Dunnum, 2017). Diversity (species richness, abundance, host and geographic distributions) must be explored across an entire local or regional avifauna rather than with a focus on specific putative host species.…”
Section: Necessity and Adequacy Of Baselines For Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%