The next urban paradigm: Cohabitation in the smart
city

Foth, Marcus

doi:10.1515/itit-2017-0034

Cited by 22 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Removing humans as the exclusive inhabitants of the epicentre of urban informatics and design attention allows us to consider a more inclusive and encompassing worldview. This non- or post-anthropocentric perspective challenges us to re-think how user-centric design methods can become more-than-human (Abrams, 1996) and world-centric design methods (DiSalvo and Lukens, 2011; Foth, 2017; Giaccardi, Cila, Speed and Caldwell, 2016; Giaccardi, Speed, Cila and Caldwell, 2016; Luusua et al , 2017). It is a useful first step to expand the aforementioned quadruple helix to a quintuple or penta helix innovation model, which includes the natural environment (Calzada, 2013; Carayannis et al , 2012), yet this is just the start of the socio-ecological transition humanity requires (Aiginger et al , 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory urban informatics: towards citizen-ability

Foth

2018

SASBE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to trace how the relationship between city governments and citizens has developed over time with the introduction of urban informatics and smart city technology. Design/methodology/approach The argument presented in the paper is backed up by a critical review approach based on a transdisciplinary assessment of social, spatial and technical research domains. Findings Smart cities using urban informatics can be categorised into four classes of maturity or development phases depending on the qualities of their relationship with their citizenry. The paper discusses the evolution of this maturity scale from people as residents, consumers, participants, to co-creators. Originality/value The paper’s contribution has practical implications for cities wanting to take advantage of urban informatics and smart city technology. First, recognising that technology is a means to an end requires cities to avoid technocratic solutions and employ participatory methodologies of urban informatics. Second, the most challenging part of unpacking city complexities is not about urban data but about a cultural shift in policy and governance style towards collaborative citymaking. The paper suggests reframing the design notion of usability towards “citizen-ability”.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory urban informatics: towards citizen-ability

Foth

2018

SASBE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Upaya kolaborasi juga dilakukan Pemda dengan membentuk jejaring bernama Jakarta Development Collaborative Network (JDCN). Jejaring ini merupakan bagian upaya pembaharuan struktur perkotaan atau Jakarta City Regeneration yang menggunakan model City 4.0 (Foth, 2017) dimana warga berperan sebagai co-creator dan Pemda sebagai kolaborator (JDCN, 2020). Kedua, komitmen kepala daerah telah ditunjukkan sejak peluncuran program Kota Cerdas Jakarta tahun 2014.…”

Section: Jakartaunclassified

“…Tingkat partisipasi dan interaksi warga dengan pemerintah membawa evolusi tersendiri bagi kota yang dikelompokkan Foth (2017) menjadi menjadi 5 tahapan. Evolusi kota dimulai dari City 1.0 (pemerintah sebagai administrator dan warga sebagai pemukim), City 2.0 (pemerintah sebagai penyedia pelayanan dan warga sebagai pengguna), kemudian City 3.0 (pemerintah sebagai fasilitator dan warga sebagai partisipan), lalu City 4.0 (pemerintah sebagai kolaborator kreasi dan warga sebagai co-creator) dan City 5.0 berupa kohabitasi pemerintah dan warga (Foth, 2017). Gambar 1.…”

unclassified

Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya

Hasanuddin

2021

pwk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kota cerdas atau smart city di Indonesia dapat ditelusuri sejak diterbitkannya Instruksi Presiden Nomor 3 tahun 2003 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan E-Government, sebagai salah satu penanda kebijakan smart governance. Secara resmi Gerakan Menuju 100 Smart City yang dicanangkan tahun ABSTRAK Kota cerdas atau smart city merupakan suatu keniscayaan dalam dunia dengan perkembangan teknologi yang pesat dan diiringi beragam tantangan perkotaan. Penerapan kota cerdas dapat menjadi sangat teknis dan mekanistik, sedemikian rupa sehingga kota cerdas kehilangan peran esensialnya sebagai wadah penghidupan warga. Perhatian ini tercermin pada kritik utama (Hollands, 2008;Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) terhadap karakter kota cerdas yang teknokratis, tidak setara, dan kurang berpusat pada warga. Mengingat sebagian besar kritik tersebut berasal dari penelitian kota cerdas di negara lain, maka menarik untuk menelaah aspek warga cerdas di Indonesia, terutama karena kota pintar telah diterapkan pada lebih dari seratus kota dalam satu dekade. Untuk itu makalah ini mengeksplorasi keberadaan kanal partisipasi digital warga di Medan, Jakarta dan Surabaya, serta posisinya dalam Jenjang Partisipasi Warga klasik dari Arnstein (1969) dan Jenjang Partisipasi dalam Teknologi Sipil terkini dari Offenhuber (2015). Dari analisis diketahui bahwa jenjang partisipasi tertinggi adalah Kemitraan dalam bentuk Hackathon di Jakarta. Penempatan (Placation) merupakan jenjang tertinggi kedua yang ditemukan di Medan, Surabaya, dan Jakarta melalui forum Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan atau Musrenbang. Temuan ini beserta keterkaitannya dengan aspek smart governance dan smart people memberikan gambaran tentang signifikansi warga dalam multidimensi pengembangan kota cerdas Indonesia.

show abstract

“…By way of an introduction, 'more-than-human' is considered to be an umbrella term that encompasses a diverse set of theories and practices with origins in and interrelationships across diverse fields of study including critical geography, urban studies, ecofeminism, new materialism, science and technology studies (STS), and decolonial studies. Just as the term 'nature-based solutions' has become an umbrella term that encompasses a range of environmental infrastructure interventions in response to anthropogenic climate change, the term 'more-than-human' is considered to be an approach to account for nonhuman agencies [11,12], recognise humanity's entanglements with ecosystems and the planet [13], work towards multispecies justice [14], and design for cohabitation [14][15][16]. Such new ways of conceptualising sustainable developmentperhaps the most pressing global agenda in the wake of what Earth scientists call the 'Holocene (or sixth mass) extinction'-are a pressing and urgent endeavour [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a More-than-Human Approach to Smart and Sustainable Urban Development: Designing for Multispecies Justice

2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The term ‘sustainability’ has become an overused umbrella term that encompasses a range of climate actions and environmental infrastructure investments; however, there is still an urgent need for transformative reform work. Scholars of urban studies have made compelling cases for a more-than-human conceptualisation of urban and environmental planning and also share a common interest in translating theory into practical approaches and implications that recognise (i) our ecological entanglements with planetary systems and (ii) the urgent need for multispecies justice in the reconceptualisation of genuinely sustainable cities. More-than-human sensibility draws on a range of disciplines and encompasses conventional and non-conventional research methods and design approaches. In this article, we offer a horizon scan type of review of key posthuman and more-than-human literature sources at the intersection of urban studies and environmental humanities. The aim of this review is to (i) contribute to the emerging discourse that is starting to operationalise a more-than-human approach to smart and sustainable urban development, and; (ii) to articulate a nascent framework for more-than-human spatial planning policy and practice.

show abstract

The next urban paradigm: Cohabitation in the smart city

Cited by 22 publications

References 6 publications

Participatory urban informatics: towards citizen-ability

Participatory urban informatics: towards citizen-ability

Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya

Towards a More-than-Human Approach to Smart and Sustainable Urban Development: Designing for Multispecies Justice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About