The nexus between capital structure and firm-specific factors: evidence from Indian companies

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this study is to empirically examine firm-specific factors that influence the financing decisions of companies listed on BSE-500 index. Firm-specific variables such as profitability, company size, growth potential, liquidity, non-debt tax shields, age and tangibility were evaluated in this study.Design/methodology/approachThis empirical research is performed using longitudinal data of 366 companies listed on the BSE 500 index during 2006–2020. Pooled ordinary least square method is employed to classify primary determinants of capital structure.FindingsThe results show that profitability, liquidity and non-debt tax shield are negatively associated whereas, company size, growth potential, age and tangibility are positively associated with the capital structure. The authors’ observations are aligned with either the trade-off hypothesis or the principle of the pecking order.Research limitations/implicationsThis study helps to better understand how firm-specific factors play a vital part in deciding the capital structure of businesses and makes a significant contribution to the literature. Thus, the present study examines the drivers of the capital structure among sample Indian companies, which allow firm managers and regulators to recognise relevant variables that optimise performance. This study is limited to Indian companies and only firm-specific variables were considered.Originality/valueThe current research focuses on the impact of firm-specific variables upon the financing decisions of Indian companies. In the background of developed countries, numerous studies in this field have been carried out. In the Indian context, however, there are not many researches in this area. However, the existing studies use one or two ordinary least square (OLS) models, resulting in a lack of thorough research and robust results. To address this gap in the analysis, the current study used four models and used a 15-year time frame, as well as a bigger sample size, which was not used in earlier investigations.

What factors impact debt levels in the health sector? Evidence for a bank system-oriented country

“…Moreover, companies with greater liquidity will have less debt to protect the interests of investors (Danso et al, 2020). Chaklader and Chawla (2016), Chakrabarti and Chakrabarti (2019), Ibrahim and Lau (2019) and Pathak and Chandani (2021) also found a negative relationship.…”

“…However, in the literature, the existence of different relationships is also verified. For example, De Jong et al (2008), Frank and Goyal (2009), Mirza et al (2017), Pathak and Chandani (2021), found a positive relationship between debt and GDP. In the case of economic prosperity, as the GDP increases, the companies where they carry out their activity have greater access to external financing to meet their needs.…”

The role of risk management committee on the relationship between corporate carbon emission disclosure and capital structure

“…Based on signaling theory (Spence, 1973), the existence of an active risk management committee that manages environmental risks and carbon emissions within a company is considered a positive signal of the company's commitment to sustainable practices (Myers & Majluf, 1984; Pathak & Chandani, 2021). This implies that the company is committed to reducing the environmental impact and carbon emissions resulting from its operations.…”

ESG–CFP Linkages: A Review of Its Antecedents and Scope for Future Research

“…The requirement for corporate governance in an organisation’s structure necessitates committees under the highest governance body to be accountable for the duties performed by them for a holistic organisational development. For a successful corporate governance framework, governance procedures and structures, profiles and competences, culture, actions and team dynamics are all key organisational features (Pathak & Chandani, 2021; Saini & Singhania, 2019). ESG accountability enables investors to determine a company’s business strategy and engagement in greater depth.…”