The NHHRC final report: view from the hospital sector

Abstract

The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC) report attempts to deal in the short term with hospital access block by funding more beds in emergency departments, while, over the longer term, reforms aim to improve hospital efficiency, transfer care of patients to non‐hospital settings, optimise use of outpatient clinics, fund hospital activities on the basis of efficient cost, and improve governance and accountability. The single most potentially effective recommendation is the considerable investment in and expansion of subacute and non‐acute services, which will free up acute‐care hospital beds for urgent cases. Population‐based chronic disease management driven by Primary Health Care Organisations can also reduce future hospitalisations considerably. What the NHHRC could have dealt with more fully is the need to: (i) prioritise clinical interventions and the need for hospitalisation using evidence of cost‐effectiveness obtained from clinical trials and longitudinal patient data; and (ii) move quickly towards funding of all health care by one level of government. Even the most effective reforms will not have a significant impact on future bed demand if professional and public expectations remain unsustainably high and do not acknowledge the need to change the role of hospitals within a reconfigured health care system.

Health system reform

“…Two further leading public health experts made the case for health reform, noting how fragmented traditional health care delivery has been marred by quality and safety defects, with a failure to provide evidence based care (Lewis and Leeder, 2009). Another senior clinician penned a view from the hospital sector, which concluded with the hope that this historic chance for major innovation in health care should not be squandered (Scott, 2009). Indeed the almost universal view was that the current system was in disarray and reform was required.…”