2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NICA/MPD Project at JINR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, the ongoing SeaQuest experiment [32], measuring Drell-Yan scattering in Fermilab, aims at providing more precise data on light quark-antiquark components, extending the Bjorken-x domain to x ≈ 0.45, where the sea quark distributions are dominated by nonperturbative regime. Moreover, determination of the PDFs will benefit from the upcoming data from facilities such as the LHC [33,34], JLab [35], J-PARC [36] and NICA [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the ongoing SeaQuest experiment [32], measuring Drell-Yan scattering in Fermilab, aims at providing more precise data on light quark-antiquark components, extending the Bjorken-x domain to x ≈ 0.45, where the sea quark distributions are dominated by nonperturbative regime. Moreover, determination of the PDFs will benefit from the upcoming data from facilities such as the LHC [33,34], JLab [35], J-PARC [36] and NICA [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermodynamics (for example, through the virial coefficients that depend on the interaction) as well as transport (the scattering rate enters the Boltzmann equation) calculations are bound to require estimates of gluon-hadron scattering. There is even a planned facility in whose physics programme looking for this mixed phase occupies a very prominent place [26], and other existing or planned experiments can probably also look for signatures of this mixed phase (ALICE at the LHC, STAR at RHIC, or CBM at FAIR).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no other procedure to define such regions without the method described above, which has proved to be useful in data processing for various systems during the RMT analysis [8,24]. In the present paper we consider the nearest-neighbor spacing momentum distribution for all charged secondary particles, and the nearest-neighbor spacing momentum distribution for N ch [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] from experimental data, and then compare them with the nearest-neighbor spacing momentum distribution for all charged secondary particles and the nearest-neighbor spacing momentum distribution for N ch [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] from the Dubna Cascade Model to the see changes with the increasing number of charged particles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the simulated data that have been obtained from the DCM [23]. We have generated 200000 events of 12 C-C collisions at 4.2 AGeV/c in the lab frame.…”
Section: Dubna Cascade Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%