on surface convective heat fluxes. Convective heat fluxes are the responses of the forcing net radiation flux received at the land-air boundary. Jegede, Balogun, and Ohmura are the earlier researchers who attempted the estimation of convective heat fluxes using indirect flux-gradient and Bowen ratio methods [4][5][6][7]. In 2012, Omokugbe et al. investigated the portioning of the net radiation flux and the surface energy fluxes using the Eddy Covariance method and presented that the midnight and the early morning hours of the days recorded negative values for the net radiation but increased at 7:30 h to peak values ranging from 317 W/m 2 to 586 W/m 2 [8]. As good as direct measurement of heat fluxes has been, it is important to stress that the cost of acquiring, installing and maintaining stations for direct measurement (using eddy covariance method) is beyond
IntroductionThe role of convective heat fluxes in the tropospheric processes cannot be overemphasized. Land surface heat fluxes are essential components of the water and energy cycles and govern the interactions between the Earth surface and the atmosphere. The results from each of the techniques were correlated with the measured heat fluxes in order to decide the best theoretical approach for the estimation of fluxes over the region of study. BR and AG compared moderately with the measured fluxes. BR scheme overestimated latent heat flux but underestimated sensible heat flux; AG technique slightly underestimated sensible heat flux but strongly underestimated latent heat fluxes with only few days of overestimation of sensible heat flux. AR, on the other hand, underestimated both latent and sensible heat fluxes. The obtained closure for AG proved much closer to the closure obtained from the direct measurement, BR has a better theoretical closure while AR failed as a whole. The trends as well as statistical analysis proved that AG performed best for sensible heat flux while BR presented good results for both latent heat flux and energy closure.