2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004108001072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nilpotent filtration and the action of automorphisms on the cohomology of finite p-groups

Abstract: Abstract. We study H * (P ), the mod p cohomology of a finite p-group P , viewed as an Fp[Out(P )]-module. In particular, we study the conjecture, first considered by Martino and Priddy, that, if e S ∈ Fp[Out(P )] is a primitive idempotent associated to an irreducible Fp[Out(P )]-module S, then the Krull dimension of e S H * (P ) equals the rank of P . The rank is an upper bound by Quillen's work, and the conjecture can be viewed as the statement that every irreducible Fp[Out(P )]-module occurs as a compositio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the p-central case, we also input Carlson and Benson's theorem that if H * (G) is Cohen-Macauley then it is Gorenstein: this leads to proofs of Theorems 2.8 and 2.9 in Section 7. Using an analysis of the formula in Theorem 2.5 done by us in [28], Theorem 2.14 is proved in Section 8, which then continues with our results about Cess * (G) and the conjectured inequality e (G) e(G). Though short examples occur throughout, some longer examples that illustrate the general theory make up Section 9.…”
Section: Organization Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the p-central case, we also input Carlson and Benson's theorem that if H * (G) is Cohen-Macauley then it is Gorenstein: this leads to proofs of Theorems 2.8 and 2.9 in Section 7. Using an analysis of the formula in Theorem 2.5 done by us in [28], Theorem 2.14 is proved in Section 8, which then continues with our results about Cess * (G) and the conjectured inequality e (G) e(G). Though short examples occur throughout, some longer examples that illustrate the general theory make up Section 9.…”
Section: Organization Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 59%
“…To understand d 0 (G) for general G, one needs to use the more complicated formula given in Theorem 2.5. Using some analysis of this already done by us in our companion paper [28], we are led to a formula 6 for d 0 (G) that makes use of the following variant of essential cohomology.…”
Section: Central Essential Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we apply some of the theory that we have developed to a problem in group cohomology considered by Nick Kuhn [2008]. We fix a prime p and a finite group P (we do not yet require P to be a p-group).…”
Section: Group Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a p-group P and a simple G-module V , Martino and Priddy [1992] asked whether the dimension of V as a composition factor of H * (P) is equal to dim H * (P) (see also [Kuhn 2008]). It was already known from [Diethelm and Stammbach 1984;Harris and Kuhn 1988;Symonds 1999] that V does occur in…”
Section: Group Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation