2014
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2014.2375691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NIM Inertial Mass Measurement Project

Abstract: An inertial mass measurement project, which is expected to precisely measure the Planck constant, h, for possible comparisons with known gravitational mass measurement projects, e.g., the watt balance and the Avogadro project, is being carried out at the National Institute of Metrology, China. The principle, apparatus, and experimental investigations of the inertial mass measurement are presented. The prototype of the experiment and the Planck constant with relative uncertainty of several parts in 10 4 have be… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where J 0 is the rotational inertia of the balance beam, m 0 the mass of the dead weight for each suspension, L the balance beam length, M 0 the mass of the balance beam, δ the distance from the central knife to the mass center of the balance beam. Note that the mechanical loss term caused by the air resistance and mechanical friction is not involved in (1); however, the oscillation period correction due to this mechanical loss term is evaluated based on measurements [9], and an effect of −1.8 × 10 −7 has been considered in determining the Planck constant. Besides, the beam length equality is experimentally ensured at a level of several parts in 10 7 [9].…”
Section: Measurement Principle Of Im-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where J 0 is the rotational inertia of the balance beam, m 0 the mass of the dead weight for each suspension, L the balance beam length, M 0 the mass of the balance beam, δ the distance from the central knife to the mass center of the balance beam. Note that the mechanical loss term caused by the air resistance and mechanical friction is not involved in (1); however, the oscillation period correction due to this mechanical loss term is evaluated based on measurements [9], and an effect of −1.8 × 10 −7 has been considered in determining the Planck constant. Besides, the beam length equality is experimentally ensured at a level of several parts in 10 7 [9].…”
Section: Measurement Principle Of Im-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the mechanical loss term caused by the air resistance and mechanical friction is not involved in (1); however, the oscillation period correction due to this mechanical loss term is evaluated based on measurements [9], and an effect of −1.8 × 10 −7 has been considered in determining the Planck constant. Besides, the beam length equality is experimentally ensured at a level of several parts in 10 7 [9]. Since ( 1) is a standard oscillation equation, its oscillation period is given as…”
Section: Measurement Principle Of Im-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation