1992
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.12-01-00021.1992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro

Abstract: This series of experiments investigated whether the NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) could induce impairments of spatial learning across a dose range comparable to its impairment of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) in vivo. Estimations of the extracellular concentration of D-AP5 in hippocampus using microdialysis were also made to compare whether these impairments occur at concentrations similar to those required to impair LTP in the in vitro hippocampal slice. Rats were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
234
2
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 513 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
16
234
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The c-fos induction effect was also seen after one trial of inhibitory avoidance in the chick brain [Anokhin and Rose, 19911 or after nine daily sessions of two-way avoidance in several regions of the rat cortex [Nikolaev et al, 19921. This behavior is at least partly dependent on hippocampal function [Calderazzo Filho et al, 1977;Gray and McNaughton, 19831. The finding of Nikolaev et al [1992] is in contrast with a previous report [Wisden et al, 19901, where no change of the expression of c-fos in the hippocampus following training in the water maze was observed, a task that is very much dependent on the hippocampus [Davis et al, 1992;Morris, 1990;Morris et al, 19861. It is not known to what extent LTP maintenance depends on pre-or on postsynaptic mechanisms. Perhaps, as was discussed above in relation to induction mechanisms, the most parsimonious guess is that LTP maintenance is regulated by both pre-and postsynaptic mechanisms [Colley and Routtenberg, 1993;Routtenberg, 19901.…”
Section: Ltp Maintenancecontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The c-fos induction effect was also seen after one trial of inhibitory avoidance in the chick brain [Anokhin and Rose, 19911 or after nine daily sessions of two-way avoidance in several regions of the rat cortex [Nikolaev et al, 19921. This behavior is at least partly dependent on hippocampal function [Calderazzo Filho et al, 1977;Gray and McNaughton, 19831. The finding of Nikolaev et al [1992] is in contrast with a previous report [Wisden et al, 19901, where no change of the expression of c-fos in the hippocampus following training in the water maze was observed, a task that is very much dependent on the hippocampus [Davis et al, 1992;Morris, 1990;Morris et al, 19861. It is not known to what extent LTP maintenance depends on pre-or on postsynaptic mechanisms. Perhaps, as was discussed above in relation to induction mechanisms, the most parsimonious guess is that LTP maintenance is regulated by both pre-and postsynaptic mechanisms [Colley and Routtenberg, 1993;Routtenberg, 19901.…”
Section: Ltp Maintenancecontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…These alterations in synaptic plasticity were associated with learning impairments in a Morris-water maze [10,12]. An association between alterations in hippocampal LTP and learning impairments has also been reported in ageing animals [13] and in response to various pharmacological and molecular manipulations [14,15], supporting the functional relevance of the link between these two variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Manipulating glutamatergic receptors appear to affect LTP and memory. For instance, blocking glutamatergic transmission via an NMDA receptor antagonist causes LTP reduction and impaired learning (Davis et al,1992; Stäubli et al,1994). Therefore, the assumption of increased glutamatergic transmission would be in line with our finding regarding memory performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%