2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Noether–Lefschetz theorem for the divisor class group

Abstract: Let X be a normal projective threefold over a field of characteristic zero and |L| be a base-point free, ample linear system on X. Under suitable hypotheses on (X, |L|), we prove that for a very general member Y ∈ |L|, the restriction map on divisor class groups Cl(X) → Cl(Y ) is an isomorphism. In particular, we are able to recover the classical Noether-Lefschetz theorem, that a very general hypersurface X ⊂ P 3 C of degree 4 has Pic(X) ∼ = Z.We work over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When E is a line bundle, the above result yields the Formal Noether-Lefschetz theorem proved in [17]. Using our formalism, and a remark by M.V.Nori, we are also able to prove the following version of the Noether-Lefschetz theorem for divisor class groups (compare with the result of [17]) which generalises the main result of a paper of Joshi [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…When E is a line bundle, the above result yields the Formal Noether-Lefschetz theorem proved in [17]. Using our formalism, and a remark by M.V.Nori, we are also able to prove the following version of the Noether-Lefschetz theorem for divisor class groups (compare with the result of [17]) which generalises the main result of a paper of Joshi [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For a generic hypersurface S described above, pullbacks of the hyperplane classes in P 1 and P 2 generate Néron-Severi lattice of S, and Picard number ρ(S) = 2 [31,32]. Let D 1 and D 2 denote divisors of hypersurface S corresponding to pullbacks of hyperplanes in P 1 and P 2 respectively.…”
Section: Class Of Elliptic K3 Surfaces Which Do Not Admit Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually when we wrote [4] we were unaware of [25] where a general result is proved using different techniques. Theorem 4.3.…”
Section: Noether-lefschetz Locimentioning
confidence: 99%