The Noetics of Nature

Foltz, Bruce V.

doi:10.2307/j.ctt13x05nt

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, both science and religion are formed by smaller communities that espouse slightly different or even incompatible traditions and views of the world. On the side of science, for instance, positivists and phenomenologists, not to say the advocates of noetics (Foltz, 2013;Krader, 2010), would disagree in almost everything regarding the natural phenomena (the ontological view of whether reality exists per se or is subjectively created) and how knowledge is appropriated (the epistemological and methodological views of whether and how to "touch" that reality). As a result, they also disagree on the scope of implications of a research's findingsfindings are either generalizable or not.…”

Section: Four Analytical Aspects Of Science and Religionmentioning

confidence: 99%

False Dichotomies (Part I): The Axiomatic Systems of Science and Religion, and Implications for Scholarly Publications

Bellini

2019

BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Four Analytical Aspects Of Science and Religionmentioning

confidence: 99%

False Dichotomies (Part I): The Axiomatic Systems of Science and Religion, and Implications for Scholarly Publications

Bellini

2019

BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It is natural for progressive thinkers to point fingers and for depth psychologists to go in search of root psychological causes. Christianity, with its historic associations to patriarchal rule, has often been a fast and easy target (Foltz, 2014). But while there are clearly aspects of Christianity that have contributed to the crisis, it would be a logical error and a strategic tragedy to mistake the part for the whole.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Care for the Earth as Archetypal Emergence in the Christian Tradition

Erickson

2017

JJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explores the renewed emphasis of care for the Earth in the Christian tradition as an emerging archetypal shift toward Earth-centered psyche. Jung proposed that the Christian psyche would continue to evolve toward greater psychic wholeness. The current trends toward environmental awareness in religious communities offer compelling parallels to Jung’s ideas about the evolution of religious consciousness. “If faith (God) is said to be able to move mountains (Job 9.5; 1 Cor. 13.2), scholars need to explore how belief systems could ‘move’ climates” (Gerten & Bergmann, 2012, p. 13).

show abstract

La raíz ontológica de la crisis ambiental. El magisterio de su santidad Bartolomé

Tâmara

2017

Theol. Xave

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Con base en el pensamiento ambiental del Patriarca de Constantinopla, se estudia la importancia de considerar la crisis y problemática ambiental a la luz de una conceptualización que destaque la significación del argumento ontológico como categoría de sentido clave para el pensamiento ambiental. El Patriarca ha desarrollado una rica argumentación ambiental relacionada con los fundamentos teológicos, espirituales y religiosos del cristianismo. Se destaca como resultado de la investigación la rica argumentación ambiental y los sentidos profundos que proporciona la teología ortodoxa en la compresión de las causas y soluciones de la problemática ambiental contemporánea.</p>

show abstract

The Noetics of Nature

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

False Dichotomies (Part I): The Axiomatic Systems of Science and Religion, and Implications for Scholarly Publications

False Dichotomies (Part I): The Axiomatic Systems of Science and Religion, and Implications for Scholarly Publications

Care for the Earth as Archetypal Emergence in the Christian Tradition

La raíz ontológica de la crisis ambiental. El magisterio de su santidad Bartolomé

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About