2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NoGo P300 ‘anteriorization’ effect and response inhibition

Abstract: Objective-The P300 event-related potential shows anterior P300 increases on NoGo tasks (target stimulus = withhold response) relative to Go tasks (target stimulus = commit response). This `NoGo anteriorization' has been hypothesized to reflect response inhibition. However, silent-count tasks show similar P300 anteriorization. The P300 anteriorization on silent-count tasks relative to Go tasks cannot reflect inhibition-related processes, and questions the degree to which anteriorization observed on NoGo trials … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our paradigm as well as Van der Stelt's only allows us to examine the P3b wave (a response elicited by the target stimuli that require a response from the subject). More complex P300 experiments incorporating additional infrequent novel stimuli that generate the P3a response would be worth investigating in the prodrome (Araki et al, 2006;Frodl-Bauch et al, 1999;Laurens et al, 2005;Mathalon et al, 2000;Salisbury et al, 2004;Salisbury et al, 2001;Sponheim et al, 2006;Sumich et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, our paradigm as well as Van der Stelt's only allows us to examine the P3b wave (a response elicited by the target stimuli that require a response from the subject). More complex P300 experiments incorporating additional infrequent novel stimuli that generate the P3a response would be worth investigating in the prodrome (Araki et al, 2006;Frodl-Bauch et al, 1999;Laurens et al, 2005;Mathalon et al, 2000;Salisbury et al, 2004;Salisbury et al, 2001;Sponheim et al, 2006;Sumich et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P300 wave reflects cortical activity during a form of continuous performance task in which subjects respond to target stimuli embedded at random in a sequence of standard stimuli. This event-related potential is more specifically known as the P3b in order to distinguish it from the P3a, a response to task-irrelevant novel infrequent stimuli not examined in this paper (Araki et al, 2006;Frodl-Bauch et al, 1999;Laurens et al, 2005;Mathalon et al, 2000;Salisbury et al, 2004;Salisbury et al, 2001;Sponheim et al, 2006). Another EEG marker investigated here, the N100 wave, reflects the early phase of attentive stimulus processing (Boutros et al, 2004;McCarley et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topographic distribution for this component is somewhat more central than the parietal P300 from the target stimulus. The no-go P300 has been linked to response inhibition mechanisms, although this hypothesis is debated (Azizian et al, 2006;Eimer, 1993;Falkenstein et al, 2000;Salisbury et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, the NGA may be considered as a noninvasive electrophysiological measurement of medial prefrontal brain function involved in response inhibition processes. This association with response inhibition, however, is still under debate and may even be absent in the auditory modality (Salisbury et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%