The nomenclatural type of the genus Methanocorpusculum Zellner et al. 1988 and the selection of the correct name

Tindall, Brian J.

doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.001385

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This issue has already been treated in detail [56]. The Judicial Commission agrees with the interpretation by Tindall [56] of Rule 15 of the ICNP [7], which stipulates:…”

Section: Opinion 111supporting

confidence: 62%

“…Oren and Garrity [55] request that the Judicial Commission takes action to retain Methanocorpusculum parvum Zellner et al 1988 as the nomenclatural type of the genus Methanocorpusculum Zellner et al 1988. This issue has already been treated in detail [56]. The Judicial Commission agrees with the interpretation by Tindall [56] of Rule 15 of the ICNP [7], which stipulates: 'The nomenclatural type […] is that element of the taxon with which the name is permanently associated, whether as a correct name or as a later heterotypic synonym. '…”

Section: Opinion 111mentioning

confidence: 74%

“…This issue has already been treated in detail [56]. The Judicial Commission agrees with the interpretation by Tindall [56] of Rule 15 of the ICNP [7], which stipulates: 'The nomenclatural type […] is that element of the taxon with which the name is permanently associated, whether as a correct name or as a later heterotypic synonym. ' It directly follows that the mere fact that Methanocorpusculum parvum Zellner et al 1988…”

Section: Opinion 111mentioning

confidence: 74%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Arahal

Busse

Bull

et al. 2022

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Opinion 103, the request to place the name Spirillum volutans Ehrenberg 1832 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names is denied because a neotype may be designated. Similarly, because a neotype may be designated, in Opinion 104 the request to place the name Beijerinckia fluminensis Döbereiner and Ruschel 1958 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names is denied. In Opinion 105, it is emphasized that the name Rhodoligotrophos Fukuda et al. 2012 does not contravene the Code. The request to orthographically correct Rhodoligotrophos Fukuda et al. 2012 to Rhodoligotrophus corrig. Fukuda et al. 2012 is denied. Opinion 106 addresses two Requests for an Opinion and results in the placement of the epithet hoagii in Corynebacterium hoagii (Morse 1912) Eberson 1918 (Approved Lists 1980) and Rhodococcus hoagii (Morse 1912) Kämpfer et al. 2014 on the list of rejected specific and subspecific epithets. Since this removes all known available earlier synonyms of Rhodococcus equi (Magnusson 1923) Goodfellow and Alderson 1977 (Approved Lists 1980), the request to conserve the epithet equi in this name is denied. In Opinion 107, Thermomicrobium fosteri Phillips and Perry 1976 (Approved Lists 1980) is placed on the list of rejected names as a nomen dubium et confusum. Opinion 108 denies the request to place Hyphomonas rosenbergii Weiner et al. 2000 on the list of rejected names because the information provided to the Judicial Commission is not sufficient to draw a conclusion on this matter. In Opinion 109, which addresses three Requests for an Opinion, the Judicial Commission denies the requests to place the names Bacillus aerius Shivaji et al. 2006, Bacillus aerophilus Shivaji et al. 2006 and Bacillus stratosphericus Shivaji et al. 2006 on the list of rejected names. Instead, it is concluded that these three names had not met the requirements for valid publication. Likewise, the Judicial Commission concludes in Opinion 110 that the name Actinobaculum massiliense corrig. Greub and Raoult 2006 had not met the requirements for valid publication. The Judicial Commission reaffirms in Opinion 111 that Methanocorpusculum parvum Zellner et al. 1988 is the nomenclatural type of Methanocorpusculum Zellner et al. 1988 and further emphasizes that the species was not in danger of losing this status. These Opinions were ratified by the voting members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.

show abstract

“…This issue has already been treated in detail [56]. The Judicial Commission agrees with the interpretation by Tindall [56] of Rule 15 of the ICNP [7], which stipulates:…”

Section: Opinion 111supporting

confidence: 62%

Section: Opinion 111mentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Opinion 111mentioning

confidence: 74%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Arahal

Busse

Bull

et al. 2022

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Methanocorpusculum

Shao¹,

Akinyemi²,

Whitman³

2020

Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Me.tha.no.cor.pus'cu.lum. N.L. neut. n. methanum methane; L. neut. n. corpusculum a particle; N.L. neut. n. Methanocorpusculum a methane‐producing particle. Halobacteriota / Methanomicrobia / Methanomicrobiales / Methanocorpusculaceae / Methanocorpusculum Small, irregular cocci, <2 μm in diameter. Endospores not formed. Stain Gram‐negative. Lysed by detergent or hypotonic shock. Nonmotile or very weakly motile. Strictly anaerobic. Fastest growth at 30–37°C, pH near 7.0. No requirement of NaCl for growth but moderately NaCl tolerant, depending on the species. Energy production by reduction of CO 2 to CH 4 with H 2 , formate, and sometimes secondary alcohols as electron donors; acetate, methylamines, or methanol are not catabolized. Acetate and either yeast extract, peptones, or rumen fluid are required as carbon and nitrogen sources. Sulfide serves as a sulfur source. Occurs in sewage sludge digesters, anaerobic wastewater treatment plants, and anaerobic reactors. Methanocorpusculum is the only genus in the family Methanocorpusculaceae and currently comprises four species with validly published names. DNA G + C content (mol%) : 49.8–52.4 (Genome). Type species : Methanocorpusculum parvum Zellner et al. 1987, VL24.

show abstract

The nomenclatural type of the genus Methanocorpusculum Zellner et al. 1988 and the selection of the correct name

Cited by 2 publications

References 17 publications

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Methanocorpusculum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About