1972
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.62.3.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies.

Abstract: This paper presents a group process for conducting an exploration of the qualitative and quantitative elements, patterns and total structure of a health care problem under preliminary investigation. Reasons for employing the nominal group process as a pilot research instrument are given. The authors emphasize that it is appropriate for some problems but not for others.The Nominal Group as a Research Instrument for ExploratoryHealth Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
361
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
361
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…After each participant had been given a chance to post their first three or four statements, the process was repeated until all participants had placed all their notes on the board. No discussion or evaluation of the value statements was made during this time, although participants were encouraged to "hitch-hike" on other people's ideas by presenting related but new ideas when their turn came (Van de Ven & Delbecq, 1972 During a break, the three researchers and one participant gave a tentative one-or two-word name to each of the categories created on the white board. Following the break, the categories were systemically discussed as the participants worked toward agreement on a one-sentence working definition for each of the categories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After each participant had been given a chance to post their first three or four statements, the process was repeated until all participants had placed all their notes on the board. No discussion or evaluation of the value statements was made during this time, although participants were encouraged to "hitch-hike" on other people's ideas by presenting related but new ideas when their turn came (Van de Ven & Delbecq, 1972 During a break, the three researchers and one participant gave a tentative one-or two-word name to each of the categories created on the white board. Following the break, the categories were systemically discussed as the participants worked toward agreement on a one-sentence working definition for each of the categories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the process followed was a little more fluid than is generally prescribed. Consistent with the purpose of this research, the resulting data are of an exploratory nature, and provide a foundation for further testing and validation (Jones & Hunter 1995;van de Ven & Delbecq 1972). Recordings of the group discussions were transcribed verbatim prior to data analysis commencing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A formal consensus development method drawing on Nominal Group Technique (NGT) [87] will be used. The NGT follows explicit steps that can be replicated, is commonly used and is a feasible and reliable technique for ranking sets of proposals [88].…”
Section: Consensus Development Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%