1978
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/4/1/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The non-linear Schrodinger equation and anomalous backward scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. It is very close to the results of calculations with more realistic phenome-nological potentials [5,10]. The improvement in the quality of the angular distribution is quite impressive, yet the correspondence to experiment is by no means excellent.…”
Section: =(P~v(o-po)/posupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3. It is very close to the results of calculations with more realistic phenome-nological potentials [5,10]. The improvement in the quality of the angular distribution is quite impressive, yet the correspondence to experiment is by no means excellent.…”
Section: =(P~v(o-po)/posupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The same problem is delt with in a more recent contribution by Fleckner and Mosel [8]. For lower energies the spatial dependence of the Pauli distortions evaluated by them is in good agreement with phenomenological substitutes (e.g., [5]) of the nonlinearity term of (1). The effect of antisymmetrization (the matrix elements themselves, the Pauli distortion of the densities and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation) is said to amount to around 70% of the effective potential without antisymmetrization.…”
Section: The Compression In the Region Of Contactsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…
Analogies to hydrodynamics led recently to the derivation of a nonlinear Schrodinger equation for the elastic scattering of heavy ions (Delion et al 1978). In the present paper, the numerical solution of this equation is shown to yield realistic values for the nuclear compressibility modulus K = 9C, with very small uncertainties.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%