2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-011-9372-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (non)making/becoming of inquiry practicing science teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the prominent uses of Foucault and his notions of power-relations in STEM educational literature is in critiquing science education from a theoretical standpoint (e.g., Bencze & Carter, 2011;Pierce, 2012;Sharma & Muzaffar, 2012;Melville & Bartley 2013). For example, Melville and Bartley (2013) use a Foucauldian-inspired Discourse Analysis to "understand the work of three teachers who have constituted identities that have allowed them to challenge the contemporary discourse of science education" (p.171).…”
Section: Stem Education Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the prominent uses of Foucault and his notions of power-relations in STEM educational literature is in critiquing science education from a theoretical standpoint (e.g., Bencze & Carter, 2011;Pierce, 2012;Sharma & Muzaffar, 2012;Melville & Bartley 2013). For example, Melville and Bartley (2013) use a Foucauldian-inspired Discourse Analysis to "understand the work of three teachers who have constituted identities that have allowed them to challenge the contemporary discourse of science education" (p.171).…”
Section: Stem Education Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important step for STEM education researchers who for many years have presented a predominantly positivistic understanding and assumption of educational practices (see discussion in chapter one). The notion of critiquing STEM education with Foucault is gaining popularity (e.g., Bencze & Carter, 2011;Pierce, 2012;Sharma & Muzaffar, 2012;Melville & Bartley 2013). STEM work in FDA such as that of Melville and Bartley (2013) has focused on examining discourse to challenge dominant powerrelations, arguing that the resistance to dominant discourse in teacher identity and issues in national curriculum would require a bringing together of teachers across multiple sites.…”
Section: The Contribution To Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%