2018
DOI: 10.1177/1363460717750822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (non)use of alcohol in topless establishments: Protection for women or gender policing?

Abstract: This article considers current and proposed restrictions placed on the adult industry in Chicago in order to explore the attempts made through legislation to control legal forms of sex work, specifically exotic dancing and burlesque. I focus specifically on the recent debate within the city of Chicago as to whether or not alcohol should be allowed in places where women are topless. While exotic dance is often discussed as a type of exploitation and a cause of urban blight, burlesque is uniformly discussed as p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, alcohol regulations may also limit a dancer's ability to be protected by the clubs and to secure financial freedom; an ironic outcome of regulations meant to protect instead of harm, due to being based in bad science. In one study (Anasti, 2018), a dancer participant discussed how she believes that alcohol prohibition materially limits a dancer's ability to make more money—an especially crucial factor considering that most dancers are independent contractors and pay the clubs to work every shift (Mount, 2018; Person, 2016). When alcohol is not a source of revenue, dancers become the primary source of revenue and commodity for clubs (Anasti, 2018; Deshotels & Forsyth, 2008), putting them in precarious relationships with clubs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…More importantly, alcohol regulations may also limit a dancer's ability to be protected by the clubs and to secure financial freedom; an ironic outcome of regulations meant to protect instead of harm, due to being based in bad science. In one study (Anasti, 2018), a dancer participant discussed how she believes that alcohol prohibition materially limits a dancer's ability to make more money—an especially crucial factor considering that most dancers are independent contractors and pay the clubs to work every shift (Mount, 2018; Person, 2016). When alcohol is not a source of revenue, dancers become the primary source of revenue and commodity for clubs (Anasti, 2018; Deshotels & Forsyth, 2008), putting them in precarious relationships with clubs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study (Anasti, 2018), a dancer participant discussed how she believes that alcohol prohibition materially limits a dancer's ability to make more money—an especially crucial factor considering that most dancers are independent contractors and pay the clubs to work every shift (Mount, 2018; Person, 2016). When alcohol is not a source of revenue, dancers become the primary source of revenue and commodity for clubs (Anasti, 2018; Deshotels & Forsyth, 2008), putting them in precarious relationships with clubs. Dancers report multifarious examples of financial exploitation by clubs such as indebting dancers, forcing payment of tips to club employees, and disparate treatment of dancers of color (Deshotels & Forsyth, 2008; Law, 2012; Mount, 2018; Silva et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations