29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 1988
DOI: 10.2514/6.1988-2316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nonlinear behavior of a passive zero-spring-rate suspension system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Woodard used the combination of various springs and structures to form a suspension device, which was named "ZSRM" and had approximately zero stiffness. However, the disadvantage of this device is that the adjustable stroke is short and the motion range is limited [9]. Ashory proposed a SMURF method based on direct substructure technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woodard used the combination of various springs and structures to form a suspension device, which was named "ZSRM" and had approximately zero stiffness. However, the disadvantage of this device is that the adjustable stroke is short and the motion range is limited [9]. Ashory proposed a SMURF method based on direct substructure technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies reported on the use of nonlinear springs with softening characteristics to achieve a quasi-zero stiffness effect for vibration isolation purposes [13][14][15]. The combination of mechanical springs and magnets has been exploited in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many politically minded geographers, the less ‘instructive’ side of geophilosophy is even less useful, or rather trying too hard to be cool to be useful, with its apparent fetishisation of human extinction or certain types of matter, including fossils, obsidian, soil, rot, slime and other objects of gothic appeal (e.g. Negarestani, 2010; Woodard, 2012). This preference for ‘dark matter’ has prompted the question whether ‘geophilosophy’ is merely an aesthetic project or a genuine challenge to dematerialised thought or to the ‘cutesy reflexive things’ of STS (Wyatt, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%