2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2008.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nonlinear dynamic relationship of exchange rates: Parametric and nonparametric causality testing

Abstract: The present study investigates the long-term linear and nonlinear causal linkages among six currencies, namely EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, USD/CHF, AUD/USD and USD/CAD. The prime motivation for choosing these exchange rates comes from the fact that they are the most liquid and widely traded, covering about 90% of total FX trading worldwide. The data spans two periods (PI: 3/20/1991 -3/20/1997, PII: 3/20/2003 -3/20/2007) before and after the structural break of the Asian financial crisis, which set a platform fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach has been proposed by Hiemstra and Jones (1994) who examined whether the Granger causality from volume to stock returns can be explained by volume serving as a proxy for information flow in the stochastic process generating stock return variance as suggested by Clark ' s (1973) latent common-factor model. Recently, Bekiros andDiks (2008) andDe Gooijer andSivarajasingham (2008) have also used the idea of controlling for conditional variance in order to reexamine the dynamic relationships between exchange rates and international stock markets, respectively. Bekiros and Diks (2008) found that the Granger causality between exchange rates persist after controlling for variance, whereas De Gooijer and Sivarajasingham (2008) found that the relationships between international stock markets disappear after filtering returns with multivariate GARCH models.…”
Section: Additional Control Variables: Stock Market Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar approach has been proposed by Hiemstra and Jones (1994) who examined whether the Granger causality from volume to stock returns can be explained by volume serving as a proxy for information flow in the stochastic process generating stock return variance as suggested by Clark ' s (1973) latent common-factor model. Recently, Bekiros andDiks (2008) andDe Gooijer andSivarajasingham (2008) have also used the idea of controlling for conditional variance in order to reexamine the dynamic relationships between exchange rates and international stock markets, respectively. Bekiros and Diks (2008) found that the Granger causality between exchange rates persist after controlling for variance, whereas De Gooijer and Sivarajasingham (2008) found that the relationships between international stock markets disappear after filtering returns with multivariate GARCH models.…”
Section: Additional Control Variables: Stock Market Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bekiros andDiks (2008) andDe Gooijer andSivarajasingham (2008) have also used the idea of controlling for conditional variance in order to reexamine the dynamic relationships between exchange rates and international stock markets, respectively. Bekiros and Diks (2008) found that the Granger causality between exchange rates persist after controlling for variance, whereas De Gooijer and Sivarajasingham (2008) found that the relationships between international stock markets disappear after filtering returns with multivariate GARCH models.…”
Section: Additional Control Variables: Stock Market Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 For the explanation of Granger causality test we follow Bekiros and Diks (2008) and Dajcman and Festić (2012).…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we perform the Engle-Granger approach [45] first to eliminate the influence of the co-integration, and then perform the nonparametric test on the collected stationary residuals from the linear regression of ∆X t and ∆Y t on a constant and the co-integration term. The procedure is similar to that in [46].…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%