The nonlinear impacts of industrial structure on China's energy intensity

Heterogeneity in rebound effects: Estimated results and impact of China’s fossil-fuel subsidies

“…1 We do not label E 2 in Fig. 2 so as to clearly illustrate the results of interaction among sectors due to technological advancement.…”

“…(1) or (3), we should measure the ''bounce quantity'' of energy consumption due to output growth promoted by technological advancement. We calculate the output incremental magnitude due to technological advancement firstly.…”

“…However, this trend was reversed in 2003-2005 because of the rapid development of energy-intensive industries. The latest studies confirm that the impact of industrial structure changes on energy conservation has directional properties, or it has ''structural bonus'' under a certain situation [1]. Therefore, technological advancement is the most important factor for energy conservation and emission abatement [2].…”

Measuring energy efficiency: Is energy intensity a good evidence base?

“…Many publications on energy intensity are aimed at evaluating energy intensity changes resulting from energy efficiency activity and other factors [37][38][39][40]. Okajima and Okajima [41] performed decomposition to examine the effect of improved energy efficiency on energy intensity.…”

Business cycle and economic-wide energy intensity: The implications for energy conservation policy in Algeria

“…However, it has been shown that, in the presence of significant structural break, the price effect is likely to be asymmetric. Li and Lin [11] have analysed the asymmetry in energy price effects in China. They found the effect to be negative in the first regime but positive in the second regime.…”