2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-017-9413-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nonprofit Response to the Migration Crisis: Systems-Theoretic Reflections on the Austrian and Slovak Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, and resonating with Barbera et al.’s (2023) framework encapsulating the concept of “bouncing forward” (although not explicitly using this term), the researchers illustrated the mobilization of an MCS during a period of crisis to identify and embrace opportunities that otherwise might never be considered. Frequently, regardless of the nomenclature used to describe how TSOs respond to crises, similar themes occur, be they in respect of the Great Recession, following the economic crisis of 2007 (Bridgeland et al., 2009), the European migration crisis (Valentinov et al., 2017), or the crisis of trust related to scandals (Hyndman et al., 2021). Therefore, although the literature suggests that precise, tight definitions of “resilience” are far from being agreed, common features of a resilient TSO include: one which is able to identify potential (and emerging) problems early; one that is able to pivot quickly in the face of an emerging crisis to ensure least damage (and long‐term survival); and one that is able to learn from the crisis experience to sharpen the organization going forward.…”
Section: The Meaning Of Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, and resonating with Barbera et al.’s (2023) framework encapsulating the concept of “bouncing forward” (although not explicitly using this term), the researchers illustrated the mobilization of an MCS during a period of crisis to identify and embrace opportunities that otherwise might never be considered. Frequently, regardless of the nomenclature used to describe how TSOs respond to crises, similar themes occur, be they in respect of the Great Recession, following the economic crisis of 2007 (Bridgeland et al., 2009), the European migration crisis (Valentinov et al., 2017), or the crisis of trust related to scandals (Hyndman et al., 2021). Therefore, although the literature suggests that precise, tight definitions of “resilience” are far from being agreed, common features of a resilient TSO include: one which is able to identify potential (and emerging) problems early; one that is able to pivot quickly in the face of an emerging crisis to ensure least damage (and long‐term survival); and one that is able to learn from the crisis experience to sharpen the organization going forward.…”
Section: The Meaning Of Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Von Bertalanffy argued that system–environment interactions are aimed at maintaining equilibrium between a system and its environment. This system–environment relation is achieved by feedback from the environment (Valentinov et al, 2017). According to Von Bertalanffy, systems can exhibit more complexity than their environment (Valentinov, 2012).…”
Section: System Environment Complex—a Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, scholars have found that governments struggle to adapt to turbulent, uncertain, and complex environments in forced migration events. Conversely, nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) respond quickly to provide needed humanitarian, social, and cultural assistance to incoming refugees (Garkisch, Heidingsfelder & Beckmann, 2017;Valentinov, Bolečeková, & Vaceková, 2017). The responsiveness of NGOs is especially critical in the beginning days and weeks of crisis when the ability to respond quickly is most needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%