2014
DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2014.952907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nordic Housing Enabler: Inter-rater reliability in cross-Nordic occupational therapy practice

Abstract: This study addresses development of a content-valid cross-Nordic version of the Housing Enabler and investigation of its inter-rater reliability when used in occupational therapy rating situations, involving occupational therapists, clients, and their home environments. The instrument was translated from the original Swedish version of the Housing Enabler, and adapted according to accessibility norms and guidelines for housing design in Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland. This iterative process involved occ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variability may be due in part to the different contexts across the studies after the tool was introduced into occupational therapists' practice. The article with the best scientific quality (Helle et al, 2010) is associated with lower interrater reliability in the trans-Nordic context, but the good percentage agreement for each of the sections supports moderate interrater reliability for the tool. Because of the article's many methodological limitations and the statistical test used (percentage agreement), it is not possible to establish acceptable interrater reliability of the Housing Enabler Screening Tool, especially when administered by employees without any health training.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This variability may be due in part to the different contexts across the studies after the tool was introduced into occupational therapists' practice. The article with the best scientific quality (Helle et al, 2010) is associated with lower interrater reliability in the trans-Nordic context, but the good percentage agreement for each of the sections supports moderate interrater reliability for the tool. Because of the article's many methodological limitations and the statistical test used (percentage agreement), it is not possible to establish acceptable interrater reliability of the Housing Enabler Screening Tool, especially when administered by employees without any health training.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The HE has demonstrated construct validity [48] and overall moderate‐to‐good interrater reliability [49]. The instrument also has been tested for interrater reliability in occupational therapy practice in a cross‐Nordic setting, with a mean percentage agreement of paired raters exceeding 80% for both components [50]. The HE rests on extensive research and has been used in large studies involving aging populations in different countries [51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,26 The HE has demonstrated sufficient interrater reliability and construct validity and is being used in cross-national aging research on home, health and disability. [27][28][29] Data on other characteristics of the housing situation were: overall housing standard (e.g. amenities according to national specifications, number of rooms), housing adaptations (i.e.…”
Section: Data Collection Tool On Housing Situation and Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%