2001
DOI: 10.1080/034687501750303864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nordic Welfare State in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…De Wispelaere (, p. 21) considered the ‘willingness to contribute’ that is retained in the popular support for universalist social policies in the Nordic countries to be a factor that would probably reduce support for a BI. This expectation of everyone contributing to the welfare system has commonly been tied to fulfilling the moral duty of working, derived from the Protestant work ethic (Julkunen, ; Kettunen, ). In a similar vein, Johansson (), discussing the limits of social citizenship in the Nordic countries, argued that the strictly means‐ and needs‐tested types of last‐resort public financial support are to be regarded as a kind of paradoxical consequence of the Nordic‐type welfare system which rests on the assumption that everyone takes part in its financing through working.…”
Section: On Introducing a Basic Income Into The Welfare Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Wispelaere (, p. 21) considered the ‘willingness to contribute’ that is retained in the popular support for universalist social policies in the Nordic countries to be a factor that would probably reduce support for a BI. This expectation of everyone contributing to the welfare system has commonly been tied to fulfilling the moral duty of working, derived from the Protestant work ethic (Julkunen, ; Kettunen, ). In a similar vein, Johansson (), discussing the limits of social citizenship in the Nordic countries, argued that the strictly means‐ and needs‐tested types of last‐resort public financial support are to be regarded as a kind of paradoxical consequence of the Nordic‐type welfare system which rests on the assumption that everyone takes part in its financing through working.…”
Section: On Introducing a Basic Income Into The Welfare Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently Finland seems to be departing from the 'traditional' Nordic model towards a hybrid one combining some Nordic features with neoliberal approaches (Aho and Lehtonen, 2002;Kettunen, 2001). The recession of the early 1990s caused a permanent restructuring of labour markets.…”
Section: Background On Finlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be contrasted with arguments posed by commentators in the US who have suggested that commercial benefits accrue mainly to private corporations (Anderlik and Rothstein, 2001). The blurring of the divide between public and private benefit and interests from biobanks is a common strategy that is employed in Finnish innovation policy narratives and follows an approach by which policies are depoliticised in Finland (Kettunen, 2001;Miettinen, 2002).…”
Section: Waste Discourse In Finlandmentioning
confidence: 99%