Antenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-1854-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Northern Regional Fetal Abnormality Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods used to organise the survey and the sources of the information enlisted have previously been described. [6][7][8] Results NOTIFICATIONS Table 1 shows the number of urological cases notified by year, the annual number of registered births in the Northern region, and the number of notifications per 1000 births. Although birth rate remained constant, the rate at which notifications were made increased by 225% during the six year period: in the final year, however, there were only nine more notifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used to organise the survey and the sources of the information enlisted have previously been described. [6][7][8] Results NOTIFICATIONS Table 1 shows the number of urological cases notified by year, the annual number of registered births in the Northern region, and the number of notifications per 1000 births. Although birth rate remained constant, the rate at which notifications were made increased by 225% during the six year period: in the final year, however, there were only nine more notifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This register covers a population of around 67,500 births per annum and is Office of the Northern region, thus allowing for data validation with Northern CESDI, the Regional Perinatal Mortality Survey and the Multiple Births Register (Atkins and Hey, 1991), (Northern Regional Survey Steering Group, 1992). A regular exchange of data is also carried out with ONS.…”
Section: West Midlands Congenital Anomaly Registermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details concerning the method for data collection have been described previously (Atkins and Hey, 1991). NorCAS is an ongoing register, all cases delivered after 1 January 1984 are recorded by year of birth irrespective of when they are first notified to the survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%