2003
DOI: 10.1080/00365520310003002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) Screening Study

Abstract: The present study bodes well for future management of a national screening programme, provided that follow-up results reflect adequate proof of a net benefit. It is highly questionable whether the addition of once-only FOBT to FS will contribute to this effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of the study design, baseline findings, and short-term follow-up have been published previously. 8,10,11 All participants who attended the screening examination provided written, informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of South-East Norway and the Norwegian Data Inspectorate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the study design, baseline findings, and short-term follow-up have been published previously. 8,10,11 All participants who attended the screening examination provided written, informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of South-East Norway and the Norwegian Data Inspectorate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity and specificity of gFOBT and FIT were derived from pooled analysis of information from diagnostic cohort studies (i.e. the diagnosis had not been determined prior to recruitment, and all participants underwent the index test and reference standard test), which included ‘screening populations' and, for gFOBT, which used Hemoccult (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) or Hemoccult II (Allison et al , 1990, 1996, 2007; Castiglione et al , 1991; Foley et al , 1992; Itoh et al , 1996; Brevinge et al , 1997; Chen et al , 1997; Nakama et al , 2000, 2001; Lieberman and Weiss, 2001; Cheng et al , 2002; Niv et al , 2002; Gondal et al , 2003; Liu et al , 2003; Sung et al , 2003; Collins et al , 2005; Morikawa et al , 2005, 2007; Nakazato et al , 2006). Three studies were combined to estimate sensitivity of FSIG for intermediate/high-risk adenomas (Rozen et al , 1987, Lieberman and Weiss, 2001; Sung et al , 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KAM cohort (Kolorektal cancer, Arv og Miljø) is based primarily on the screening group of the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (the NORCCAP study) in the county of Telemark, Norway [21]. Additionally, a series of colorectal cancer cases was recruited to the KAM cohort from routine clinical work at Telemark Hospital in Skien and Ullevål University Hospital in Oslo.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%