European Margin Sediment Dynamics 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55846-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Norwegian Margin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) are found to be the largest submarine slides documented on glaciated, or glacially influenced, margin areas (Bugge, 1983;Kenyon, 1987;Aksu and Hiscott, 1989;Dowdeswell et al, 1996;van Weering et al, 1998;Vorren et al, 1998Vorren et al, , 2003Bart et al, 1999;Laberg et al, , 2002aVorren and Laberg, 2001;Imbo et al, 2003;Piper and McCall, 2003;Taylor et al, 2000Taylor et al, , 2003. The slides have also created prominent scars that have deeply influenced the shape of the Norwegian margin (e.g., Vorren et al, 2003). The largest of these slides is the Storegga Slide, considered by Bugge (1983) to be the largest exposed submarine slide in the world affecting an area of 112 000 km 2 ; revised by Haflidason et al (2002) to be c. 95 000 km 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1) are found to be the largest submarine slides documented on glaciated, or glacially influenced, margin areas (Bugge, 1983;Kenyon, 1987;Aksu and Hiscott, 1989;Dowdeswell et al, 1996;van Weering et al, 1998;Vorren et al, 1998Vorren et al, , 2003Bart et al, 1999;Laberg et al, , 2002aVorren and Laberg, 2001;Imbo et al, 2003;Piper and McCall, 2003;Taylor et al, 2000Taylor et al, , 2003. The slides have also created prominent scars that have deeply influenced the shape of the Norwegian margin (e.g., Vorren et al, 2003). The largest of these slides is the Storegga Slide, considered by Bugge (1983) to be the largest exposed submarine slide in the world affecting an area of 112 000 km 2 ; revised by Haflidason et al (2002) to be c. 95 000 km 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The fl int daggers were a way of showing affi liation to a larger network, which could be one of the reasons why they became so popular and were distributed so widely, to as far as northern parts of Scandinavia, as well as the Netherlands and Central Europe ( 1973;Skov 1982;Simonsen 1983;Boas 1986;1991;1993;Asing 1988;Tauber 1971;Earle 1991;Kristensen & Earle 1992;Ethelberg 1993;K. L. Rasmussen 1993;Rahbek & Rasmussen 1994;Vandkilde 1996;Earle et al 1998;Liversage 1989;2003;Borup 2002;Sarauw 2006;Olsen 2013. Data after Table 74. diffi cult to identify in the archaeological record.…”
Section: Agrarian Activities In Western Norway During the Mid-3rd Milmentioning
confidence: 99%