The Norwegian PraksisNett: a nationwide practice-based research network with a novel IT infrastructure

Abstract

Purpose Clinical research in primary care is relatively scarce. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are research infrastructures to overcome hurdles associated with conducting studies in primary care. In Norway, almost all 5.4 million inhabitants have access to a general practitioner (GP) through a patient-list system. This gives opportunity for a PBRN with reliable information about the general population. The aim of the current paper is to describe the establishment, organization and function of PraksisNett (the Norwegian Primary Care Research Network). Materials and Methods We describe the development, funding and logistics of PraksisNett as a nationwide PBRN. Results PraksisNett received funding from the Research Council of Norway for an establishment period of five years (2018–2022). It is comprised of two parts; a human infrastructure (employees, including academic GPs) organized as four regional nodes and a coordinating node and an IT infrastructure comprised by the Snow system in conjunction with the Medrave M4 system. The core of the infrastructure is the 92 general practices that are contractually linked to PraksisNett. These include 492 GPs, serving almost 520,000 patients. Practices were recruited during 2019–2020 and comprise a representative mix of rural and urban settings spread throughout all regions of Norway. Conclusion Norway has established a nationwide PBRN to reduce hurdles for conducting clinical studies in primary care. Improved infrastructure for clinical studies in primary care is expected to increase the attractiveness for studies on the management of disorders and diseases in primary care and facilitate international research collaboration. This will benefit both patients, GPs and society in terms of improved quality of care. Key points Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are research infrastructures to overcome hurdles associated with conducting studies in primary care Improved infrastructure for clinical studies in primary care is expected to increase the attractiveness for studies on the management of disorders and diseases in primary care and facilitate international research collaboration We describe PraksisNett, a Norwegian PBRN consisting of 92 general practices including 492 GPs, serving almost 520,000 patients An advanced and secure IT infrastructure connects the general practices to PraksisNett and makes it possible to identify and recruit patients in a novel way, as well as reuse clinical data PraksisNett will benefit both patients, GPs and society in terms of improved quality of care This paper may inform and inspire initiatives to establish PBRNs elsewhere

Self-reported short and long sleep duration, sleep debt and insomnia are associated with several types of infections: Results from the Norwegian practice-based research network in general practice – PraksisNett

“…The GPs surgeries are connected to the network through an advanced IT infrastructure named Snow. In the Snow system, no central database is required, and all patient data are stored within the IT infrastructure in each GP surgery ensuring the anonymity of patient information [ 11 ]. This Snow infrastructure enables identification of potential study participants based on e.g., diagnoses.…”

SupportPrim—a computerized clinical decision support system for stratified care for patients with musculoskeletal pain complaints in general practice: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

“…Participating GPs will be recruited nationwide using the Norwegian Primary Care Research Network (PraksisNett, www.uib.no/praksisnett ), which is a research infrastructure of close to 500 GPs that facilitates recruitment of primary care patients to clinical studies [ 34 ]. Additional GPs will be recruited through direct invitation and promotion at conferences and social media targeted at GPs.…”

Integration of migrant and refugee data in health information systems in Europe: advancing evidence, policy and practice

“…In some cases, even with consent, pseudonymized datasets might still be used to identify individuals. To address this, decentralized, federated analysis methods 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 can be used to ensure individual-level analysis without linking data across different sources (see below under Political and structural barriers ). These methods are increasingly being used in general health systems, but yet rarely used in the context of migrant and refugee health.…”