1902
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-190206000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nose and throat in the history of medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1937
1937
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vapors, it was believed, passed from the nose across the cribriform plate to the brain. There they were transformed into catarrh, which leaked back across the plate into the nasal cavity and ultimately the lungs (90). This dogma persisted until the second half of the 17th century when Schneider and Lower independently showed that, although the cribriform bone was porous in skeletons, it was impermeable to liquids in vivo (43,62).…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vapors, it was believed, passed from the nose across the cribriform plate to the brain. There they were transformed into catarrh, which leaked back across the plate into the nasal cavity and ultimately the lungs (90). This dogma persisted until the second half of the 17th century when Schneider and Lower independently showed that, although the cribriform bone was porous in skeletons, it was impermeable to liquids in vivo (43,62).…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These apparatuses suffered from lack of adequate illumination of the larynx. In 1844, a headband to which a semispherical reflector with a hole in the center for viewing was introduced by Mr. Avery of London 5 . The concentration of light to a spot some distance ahead was later refined by Czermak and is similar in appearance to the head mirrors used today.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His extensive observations of the phonating larynx served as an impetus for future laryngeal investigations. Examination of vocal folds in healthy and diseased states has been the subject of treatises by Mackenzie, Czermack, Garcia, and others 4‐6 . Moore summarized some of this early history 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these works, Casserius had the German painter Josias Mauer stay in his home for the purpose of “drawing anatomic illustrations (Choulant, ).” Neither Fabricus nor Casserius acknowledged the works or contributions of the other (Riva et al, ). Riva et al () described that even despite the absence of names, their “…conflict was echoed in the relevant dedications to the Duke of Parma (Ranuccio Farnese) and to three Venetian noblemen…” Wright believed that the absence of tribute between Casserius and Fabricius was due to the timing of experimentation and publication (Wright, ). However, it seems clear that this evaluation was more concerned with the history of the medicine of the nose and throat, and had less to do with the deteriorating relations between Casserius and his former mentor (Wright, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riva et al () described that even despite the absence of names, their “…conflict was echoed in the relevant dedications to the Duke of Parma (Ranuccio Farnese) and to three Venetian noblemen…” Wright believed that the absence of tribute between Casserius and Fabricius was due to the timing of experimentation and publication (Wright, ). However, it seems clear that this evaluation was more concerned with the history of the medicine of the nose and throat, and had less to do with the deteriorating relations between Casserius and his former mentor (Wright, ). Additionally, both authors claimed to be preparing anatomical texts complete with plates, a resource that was, as of yet, not available to medical students (Riva et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%