2002
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237822.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Noun Phrase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of category could be broadened to include also constructions (which are just complex syntactic categories with specific properties), such as ditransitive constructions (Haspelmath 2005), non-verbal predicative constructions (Stassen 1997), relative clauses (Lehmann 1984), or noun phrases (Rijkhoff 2002), as well as phonological categories such as velar nasals (Anderson 2005) or stress (Goedemans & van der Hulst 2005). At a more abstract level, general notions such as sentence, clause, phrase, word, clitic, affix, stem, root, inflection, syllable, diphthong, consonant must also be regarded as (highly abstract) categories of language form, though it is less obvious that typology has made significant contributions to understanding them.…”
Section: Structural Categories and Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of category could be broadened to include also constructions (which are just complex syntactic categories with specific properties), such as ditransitive constructions (Haspelmath 2005), non-verbal predicative constructions (Stassen 1997), relative clauses (Lehmann 1984), or noun phrases (Rijkhoff 2002), as well as phonological categories such as velar nasals (Anderson 2005) or stress (Goedemans & van der Hulst 2005). At a more abstract level, general notions such as sentence, clause, phrase, word, clitic, affix, stem, root, inflection, syllable, diphthong, consonant must also be regarded as (highly abstract) categories of language form, though it is less obvious that typology has made significant contributions to understanding them.…”
Section: Structural Categories and Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas formal frameworks are concerned with similarities in the syntactic structure of NPs and clauses, functional theories have focused on parallels between semantic representations of these linguistic units. In the framework of Functional Grammar (Dik 1997) such parallels were first discussed in Rijkhoff (1988) and they will be briefly presented below (for a more elaborate presentation the reader is referred to Rijkhoff 2002). …”
Section: Parallels Between Nps and Sentencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These classifiers are usually used for dividing living beings into groups with the help of collective nouns, which semantically correlate with the word 'group' (Rijkhoff, 2002;Beckwith, 2007;Payne, 2011).…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%