2020
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1726729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The noxious consequences of innovation: what do we know?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bibliographic coupling and co-occurrence analysis were performed using VOSviewer software (Biggi & Giuliani, 2020). VOSviewer Networks can be constructed for different units of analysis.…”
Section: Data Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliographic coupling and co-occurrence analysis were performed using VOSviewer software (Biggi & Giuliani, 2020). VOSviewer Networks can be constructed for different units of analysis.…”
Section: Data Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more explicit and expansive engagement with value creation thus requires asking questions such as what future do we want, why do we want this future, who defines it, and transformation by and for whom? As many chapters demonstrate, this extends our analytical gaze towards more capacious forms of innovation that encompass technological, social, grassroot, and public-sector innovation (Coenen & Morgan, 2020), opens our eyes to the potential dark sides of innovation (Biggi & Giuliani, 2020), and effectively opens up a more contested view on innovation and regional development that forefronts the notion of responsibility (Jakobsen, Fløysand, & Overton, 2019). While refreshing and original on many accounts, the book remains however loyal to a central premise in the regional development literature namely that of being empirically grounded and place-based.…”
Section: Rethinking Clusters Place-based Value Creation In Sustainabi...mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Another nuance is how we view innovation. Policy makers and academics largely assume that innovation is universally good and tend to ignore potential downsides (Biggi & Giuliani, 2021;Coad et al, 2021). Innovation can-and often does-have both positive and negative effects and these are usually unevenly distributed.…”
Section: Taking Systems Approaches Out Of Theirmentioning
confidence: 99%