2014
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1408.4060
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NUHM2 after LHC Run 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For many of these constraints, we follow very closely our previous implementations, which were summarized recently in Table 1 in [17]. Updates concerning BR(b → sγ), BR(B u → τ ν τ ), Higgs boson masses and rates etc.…”
Section: Our Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For many of these constraints, we follow very closely our previous implementations, which were summarized recently in Table 1 in [17]. Updates concerning BR(b → sγ), BR(B u → τ ν τ ), Higgs boson masses and rates etc.…”
Section: Our Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each panel the solid black line is for the pMSSM10, the solid blue line for the NUHM2, the dashed blue line for the NUHM1 and the dotted blue line for the CMSSM (the latter three lines are updated from Ref. [17] to include new constraints such as the LHC combined value of M h [33]). In the case of m g, we see that significantly lower masses are allowed in the pMSSM10 than in the other models: > 1250 GeV at the 68% CL and ∼ 1000 GeV at the 95% CL.…”
Section: Sparticle Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to find values for the slepton generation mixing parameters we need a specific form of the product Y † ν Y ν as shown in Eq. (10). The simple consideration of direct hierarchical neutrinos with a common scale for right handed neutrinos provides a representative reference value.…”
Section: Mssm and Its Seesaw Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] and references therein), the hypothesis of MFV has been used, and it has been assumed that the contributions coming from MFV are negligible for other observables as well, see, e.g., Ref. [10]. In this paper we will analyze whether this assumption is justified, and whether including these MFV effects could lead to additional constraints on the CMSSM parameter space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%