1971
DOI: 10.1017/s0008197300089698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nullity of Marriage Act 1971

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinctions are also made between 'void' and 'voidable' marriages, the complexities of which are not especially germane to the present discussion-suffice to note that a void marriage is deemed to have never constituted a marriage at all, while a voidable marriage is one that can be understood to have existed up until its nullification (Cretney and Masson 1997, 39-40;Goda 1967;Hall 1971;Passingham and Harmer 1985, 46). Weddings deploy speech acts and performative utterances.…”
Section: Annulmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Distinctions are also made between 'void' and 'voidable' marriages, the complexities of which are not especially germane to the present discussion-suffice to note that a void marriage is deemed to have never constituted a marriage at all, while a voidable marriage is one that can be understood to have existed up until its nullification (Cretney and Masson 1997, 39-40;Goda 1967;Hall 1971;Passingham and Harmer 1985, 46). Weddings deploy speech acts and performative utterances.…”
Section: Annulmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Thus the array of conditions that can invalidate a marriage varies significantly, not only across time and space, but even within jurisdictions: a couple married in 1950 might have grounds for annulment today that would not be available to a couple married in 1980. 4 Typically, however, a distinction is drawn between void and voidable unions (Cretney and Masson 1997, 40;Hall 1971).…”
Section: Weddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%