Background: Patient satisfaction is a patient-centered outcome of particular interest. Previous work has suggested that global measures of satisfaction may not adequately evaluate surgical care; therefore, the surgery-specific S-CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey was developed. It remains unclear how traditional outcome measures such as morbidity impact patient satisfaction. Our aim was to determine whether NSQIP-defined complications impacted satisfaction with the surgeon as measured by a surgery-specific survey, the S-CAHPS. Methods: All patients undergoing a general surgical operation from 6/13-11/13 were sent the S-CAHPS survey after discharge. Retrospective chart review was conducted using NSQIP variable definitions, and major complications were defined. Data were analyzed as a function of response to the overall surgeon-rating item, and those surgeons rated as the "best possible" or "topbox" were compared with those rated lower. Univariate and logistic regression were used to determine variable importance. Results: 529 patients responded, and 71.5% (378/529) rated the surgeon as topbox. The overall NSQIP complication rate was 14.2% (75/529) with 26.7% of those (20/75) being major complications. On univariate analysis, patients who rated their surgeon more highly were somewhat older (59 vs. 54yrs: p <0.001), more often underwent elective surgery (81% vs. 57%: p <0.001), and had an increased rate of operation for malignancy (31% vs. 17%). Neither the complication rate (total or major) nor the number of complications were associated with satisfaction scores. Conclusions: When examined on a patient-level with surgery-specific measures and outcomes, the presence of complications after an operation does not appear to be associated with overall patient satisfaction with surgeon care. This finding suggests that satisfaction may be an outcome distinct from traditional measures.