2017
DOI: 10.24200/sci.2017.4503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Numerical Solution of the Bagley-Torvik Equation by Exponential Integrators

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a family of computational schemes for the solution to the Bagley-Torvik equation. The schemes are based on the reformulation of the original problem into a system of fractional di erential equations of order 1/2. Then, suitable exponential integrators are devised to solve the resulting system accurately. The attainable order of convergence of exponential integrators for solving the fractional problem is studied. Theoretical ndings are validated by means of some numerical examples.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We must mention that several other approaches have been however discussed in the literature: see, for instance, the generalized Adams methods [10], extensions of the Runge-Kutta methods [11], generalized exponential integrators [12,13], spectral methods [14,15], spectral collocation methods [16], methods based on matrix functions [17][18][19][20], and so on. In this paper, for brevity, we focus only on PI rules and FLMMs, and we refer the reader to the existing literature for alternative approaches.…”
Section: Multi-step Methods For Fdesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We must mention that several other approaches have been however discussed in the literature: see, for instance, the generalized Adams methods [10], extensions of the Runge-Kutta methods [11], generalized exponential integrators [12,13], spectral methods [14,15], spectral collocation methods [16], methods based on matrix functions [17][18][19][20], and so on. In this paper, for brevity, we focus only on PI rules and FLMMs, and we refer the reader to the existing literature for alternative approaches.…”
Section: Multi-step Methods For Fdesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the solution of the nonlinear equations in Equation (12) for the evaluation of y n , a predictor-corrector (PC) approach is sometimes preferred, in which a first approximation of y n is predicted by means of the explicit PI rectangular rule (10) and hence corrected by the implicit PI trapezoidal rule (12) according to:…”
Section: Product-integration Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even if many numerical methods for FDEs can be extended to MTFDEs, delicate issues such as numerical stability, convergence or accuracy cannot be easily predicted in this case. Many authors have worked thoroughly on their numerical solution [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. We restrict our attention to the linear case that includes important models, such as the Bagley-Torvik equation [23], the fractional oscillation equation [24] and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for α = 1/2 and β = 0, we have ω 5 (t) = 1 − 1 2 t 2 . Absolute errors of the 5th approximate solution for FPTE (17) and (18) are computed for α = 1/2, with selected nods of t with step size 0.16 and summarized in Table 3, while Table 4 shows the numerical results of the RPS algorithm and exponential integrators method (EIM) [36] for the parameter value β = 0.2 and different values of t in [0, 5]. Example 4.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, according to the RPS algorithm, the 5th approximate solution of FBTEs (19) and (20) is given as ω 5 (t) = 1 − ϕ(0) − 1 2 t 4α Γ(4α+1) + 1 4 − 1 2 ϕ(0) t 5α Γ(5α+1) . The resulting values of the RPS algorithm and some numerical methods, including the Fermat Tau method (FTM) [38], the generalized Taylor method (GTM) [36], and the fractional Taylor method (FrTM) [37], for inputs t between 0 and 1 with a step of 0.1, are given in Table 5. From this table, it can be illustrated that the result obtained by our scheme is in good agreement with the state-of-the-art numerical solvers.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%