The NuVasive MAGEC Rod Urgent Field Safety Notice Concerning Locking Pin Fracture

Abstract

Study Design. Analysis of explanted MAGnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) growing rods. Objective. The aim of this study was to quantify the rate of locking pin breakage in explanted MAGEC rods and compare with the manufacturer's data. Summary of Background Data. On June 25, 2019, NuVasive released an Urgent Field Safety Notice stating that MAGEC rods manufactured before March 26, 2015 had a higher than expected locking pin breakage rate of 5%. For rods made on or after that date, no pin breakages had occurred. Methods. From our independent explant database of 139 explanted MAGEC rods supplied from 10 UK spinal centers (Belfast, Bristol, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Exeter, Leeds, Newcastle, Nottingham, Oxford, and Sheffield) and one Danish center (Aarhus), we divided the rods into those manufactured before March 26, 2015, and those manufactured on or after that date. MAGEC rods were cut open to fully assess internal components including locking pins. From each of the two cohorts, 10 locking pins were selected at random and their diameters were measured using a micrometer. Results. One hundred and five explanted MAGEC rods were made before March 26, 2015 and could be disassembled to allow the locking pin to be examined. Fifty-nine percent (62/105) of these locking pins had fractured. For the MAGEC rods manufactured on or after March 26, 2015, 21% (6/29) were found to have fractured locking pins. Locking pins in MAGEC rods made on or after March 26, 2015 were of a stronger material and a larger diameter. Conclusion. Fifty-nine percent of the locking pins in MAGEC rods manufactured before March 26, 2015 had fractured, far greater than the 5% stated in the Urgent Field Safety Notice. Locking pin fracture still occurred in MAGEC rods manufactured on or after that date, in 21% of cases. This contrasted with the 0% reported by the manufacturer. Level of Evidence: 4

Identifying complications and failure modes of innovative growing rod configurations using the (hybrid) magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and the spring distraction system (SDS)

“…drive pin or lead screw fractures), and is hypothesised to be caused by high-frictional forces inside the actuator [6,7]. While newer versions of the MCGR have been developed, mechanical complications remain prevalent [8]. The re-operations necessary to correct these complications are a serious burden for the patient and increases treatment cost dramatically, potentially making MCGR treatment less cost-effective than previously described, as calculations were based only on a relatively short follow-up [9][10][11][12].…”

The Performance of MAGEC X Spine Rods: A Comparative Retrieval Study

“…In order to perform an equitable comparison between the 2 rod design iterations, only MAGEC 1.3 implants with a time to removal less than 34 months (maximum time to removal of a MAGEC X implant recorded at our retrieval centre) were included. Time to removal has been found to significantly influence retrieval findings, including wear rate, 10 force generated by the implant, 11 pin fracture, 12 and implant functionality. 13 Excluding implants with longer follow-up led to an overall relatively high implant-related reason for removal (in 13/20 patients).…”

Pin Fracture in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Influence of the Year of Manufacture

“…A previous retrieval study reported evidence of locking pin fractures in 62 of 105 (59%) and 6 of 29 (21%) of rods collected at their center that had been manufactured before and after this date, respectively. 12 This study also indicated that the earlier design was grade 440 stainless steel, which changed to 465 stainless steel.…”