2011
DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2011.575081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The objective and subjective outcome of orthodontic care in one municipal health center

Abstract: Orthodontic treatment seems to improve both occlusal morphology and function. The high satisfaction with one's own dental appearance among the treated adolescents is worth noting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second theme related to dental health and the first subtheme, aesthetic improvement, was one of the notable outcomes, with the relationship between aesthetic improvement and psychosocial effects also being evident. Recent research supports the current findings and concluded that patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment were more satisfied with their dental appearance than an untreated group (19). In future studies, it would be interesting to compare different malocclusions to investigate whether some patients benefit more from treatment than others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The second theme related to dental health and the first subtheme, aesthetic improvement, was one of the notable outcomes, with the relationship between aesthetic improvement and psychosocial effects also being evident. Recent research supports the current findings and concluded that patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment were more satisfied with their dental appearance than an untreated group (19). In future studies, it would be interesting to compare different malocclusions to investigate whether some patients benefit more from treatment than others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For these reasons, it was decided to use the VAS (Visual Analog Scale) as a complementary method, as it is considered a clear, simple way to assess the patient’s esthetic perception and has been used by several authors ( 10 - 12 , 30 ). Some researchers highlight its simplicity and ease of use and the fact that the absence of numbers or images reduces the possibility of bias ( 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS was considered as a more straightforward way to ascertain the patient's perception of the aesthetics. Also, it was a quick method with high reproducibility (Heravi, Rashed, & Abachizadeh, 2011;Hirvinen, Heikinheimo, & Svedström-Oristo, 2012;Ioi, Nakata, & Counts, 2010).…”
Section: Generalizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%