1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(79)90901-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The objective assessment of trombone quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, Pratt and Bowsher (1979) maintain that even though it is extremely difficult to relate such physical characteristics as the geometry of the instrument and its material composition to the dimensions of subjective quality, only when physical correlates to these numerous dimensions have been established will it be possible to describe an instrument as having a particular objective quality. After having discussed the effect of certain parameters such as the internal bore cleanliness, the mouthpiece cup volume, and the throat diameter, Pratt and Bowsher were not able to establish an entirely satisfactory relationship between the subjective quality and the geometry of an instrument.…”
Section: Sound Quality and Timbral Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Again, Pratt and Bowsher (1979) maintain that even though it is extremely difficult to relate such physical characteristics as the geometry of the instrument and its material composition to the dimensions of subjective quality, only when physical correlates to these numerous dimensions have been established will it be possible to describe an instrument as having a particular objective quality. After having discussed the effect of certain parameters such as the internal bore cleanliness, the mouthpiece cup volume, and the throat diameter, Pratt and Bowsher were not able to establish an entirely satisfactory relationship between the subjective quality and the geometry of an instrument.…”
Section: Sound Quality and Timbral Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Wogram [19] (who wasquoted later by Pratt and Bowsher [18]) introduced what he termed a"Summenprizinzip" (or "sum function" in English): the impedance values of an instrument at integral multiples of the fundamental frequencyc ombine at the player'sl ips to establish the playing frequency. Actually,the sum function is the sum of the acoustic power entering the resonator for af orced oscillation with fixed flowrate amplitude and spectrum.…”
Section: The "Sum Function": Asupposed Indicator Of the Playing Frequmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature [19,18],o ther indicators like" sum functions", have been defined in order to predict playing frequencies more accurately than the resonance frequencies from the input impedance. As um function is thus evaluated by using our set of experimental data in the following section.…”
Section: Differences Of Playing Frequencies Vs Differences Of Resonanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Athorough study of the perceivedquality of reeds, and more generally of musical instruments, necessitates two categories of measurements on as et of products: subjective assessments givenb ym usicians or listeners [1], and objective measurements (chemical or physical)made on a set of instruments [2]. The task is then to uncover( with statistical methods)amodel for predicting subjective dimensions from the objective measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%