2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000085098.69522.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Objective Measurement of Spinal Orthosis Use for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Abstract: Temperature provides a clear signal of the time in brace and can be used for long-term data logging using discrete instrumentation, providing a tool to help identify and understand the reasons behind poor compliance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
97
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
11
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for surgery is based on evidence supporting morbidity unrelated to the musculoskeletal system as curve magnitude increases [33,36,37,56]. Moderate and severe thoracic curves are associated with reduced vital capacity and total lung capacity [20,21,27,48].…”
Section: Natural Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rationale for surgery is based on evidence supporting morbidity unrelated to the musculoskeletal system as curve magnitude increases [33,36,37,56]. Moderate and severe thoracic curves are associated with reduced vital capacity and total lung capacity [20,21,27,48].…”
Section: Natural Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the literature supports initiating nighttime bracing for curves measuring less than 35°with an apex below T9, although centers with experience with these braces may choose to expand the indications [14,19,27,[33][34][35]. Hence, future studies, like the Level 1 BrAIST study [53], will be needed to compare full-time versus part-time bracing using SRS guidelines to determine efficacy of each bracing model to prevent progression of curvature and improve function.…”
Section: Bracing Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of wear hours reported in these studies was subjective and difficult to verify due to reliance on patient recall, with the possibility of false reporting. Others have looked at developing objective ways of measuring brace wear compliance by using pressure monitoring [5][6][7] or temperature sensing [8][9][10][11][12]. These sensors worked; however, they were bulky.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 50% in-brace Cobb angle correction and adherence to a 20-23 h per day wear regimen are mandatory for success [36][37][38][39]. However, the use of bracing is controversial: compliance (hours in brace/prescribed brace regimen) has been found to be as low as 62-67.5% in rigid braces [6,40,41] and pooled data in meta-analysis on observation, exercises and bracing did not provide evidence to recommend one approach over the other [42,43]. This may reflect the physical and psychosocial impacts of a rigid, visible and warm orthosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%