2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2016.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The observational signature of modelled torsional waves and comparison to geomagnetic jerks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7, 8). This confirms the conclusions previously obtained by Cox et al (2016) regarding the difficulty to offer an explanation for geomagnetic jerks solely resting on torsional waves, as was initially advocated for by Bloxham et al (2002). Future studies should therefore attempt to highlight other possible mechanisms for these sudden changes in the geomagnetic secular acceleration.…”
Section: Dynamic Variability Versus Kinematic Invariance Along the Pathsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…7, 8). This confirms the conclusions previously obtained by Cox et al (2016) regarding the difficulty to offer an explanation for geomagnetic jerks solely resting on torsional waves, as was initially advocated for by Bloxham et al (2002). Future studies should therefore attempt to highlight other possible mechanisms for these sudden changes in the geomagnetic secular acceleration.…”
Section: Dynamic Variability Versus Kinematic Invariance Along the Pathsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…3c, d). This effect is similar to that observed by Cox et al (2016), who explore whether global torsional waves can couple with heterogeneous background magnetic fields to produce localized signals in SV resembling geomagnetic jerks.…”
Section: Generation Of Secular Variation and Accelerationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Recent studies by Gillet et al (2010Gillet et al ( , 2015 and Holme and de Viron (2013) point to a ∼ 6-year variation originating in the core that is also observable in length-ofday data. The signal was also discussed by Abarca del Rio et al (2000), Mound and Buffet (2006), Cox et al (2016), and Duan et al (2018). We note, however, that both periodicities are very close to the harmonics of the solar cycle, suggesting a possible external origin.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%