2003
DOI: 10.1049/ir:20030914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The obsolescence minefield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the F-22 program office has prioritized the development of proactive DMSMS strategies to reduce these threats in the supply chain. Costs associated with obsolescence are unavoidable; however, developing a proactive plan for predicted DMSMS issues is much less expensive than reacting to an unexpected obsolescence event (Bumbalough, 1999;Josias et al, 2004;Frank and Morgan, 2007;Trenchard, 2003).…”
Section: Importance Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the F-22 program office has prioritized the development of proactive DMSMS strategies to reduce these threats in the supply chain. Costs associated with obsolescence are unavoidable; however, developing a proactive plan for predicted DMSMS issues is much less expensive than reacting to an unexpected obsolescence event (Bumbalough, 1999;Josias et al, 2004;Frank and Morgan, 2007;Trenchard, 2003).…”
Section: Importance Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to DMSMS issues, the DoD often implements reactively: re-engineering weapon systems to replace the obsolete component with an available alternative, stockpiling at risk components, and contracting new companies to manufacture the item(s) (Weiss, 1995;Josias, et al, 2004;Frank and Morgan, 2007;Trenchard, 2003). While these initiatives have been successful, they are very expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolution of the Level of Obsolescence Based on the Management ApproachTraditionally, the military has dealt with obsolescence in a reactive mode[12]. However, this approach is inadvisable because finding a solution with little advance warning is expensive[12,33,42]. Several authors[1,7,12,13,18,27,33,[43][44][45][46] have highlighted the need to change from reactive to proactive approaches concerning obsolescence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%