2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The occurrence of Anaplasmataceae in European populations of invasive carnivores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that neither CNL nor “ Candidatus Neoehrlichia sp.” (FU98) (see below) have been confirmed in populations of raccoons in Europe ( 15 ) and Japan ( 6 ) support the hypothesis that the narrow specificity of CNL to native populations of raccoons in North American presumably relates to a vector ( 15 ).…”
Section: Molecular Prevalence and Diversity Of Tick-borne Anaplasmatasupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that neither CNL nor “ Candidatus Neoehrlichia sp.” (FU98) (see below) have been confirmed in populations of raccoons in Europe ( 15 ) and Japan ( 6 ) support the hypothesis that the narrow specificity of CNL to native populations of raccoons in North American presumably relates to a vector ( 15 ).…”
Section: Molecular Prevalence and Diversity Of Tick-borne Anaplasmatasupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The obtained rrs and groEL sequences showed to be closely related to the raccoon associated “ Candidatus Neoehrlichia lotoris” from North America but clearly distinct from the Ixodes ricinus transmitted zoonotic “ Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” found in Eurasia ( 97 ). Later, this agent was also detected in foxes (0.8%) from Czech Republic ( 7 ), in an European badger ( Meles meles ) from Hungary ( 98 ) and, more recently, in foxes (0.4%) in Western Austria ( 32 ) and in raccoon dogs (30%) from Poland ( 15 ) (Table 2 ). More studies are necessary in order to isolate this new agent as well as investigate its geographic distribution and host range.…”
Section: Molecular Prevalence and Diversity Of Tick-borne Anaplasmatamentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations