The Ocular Microbiome Is Altered by Sampling Modality and Age

Abstract

Background Studies of the ocular microbiome have used a variety of sampling techniques, but no study has directly compared different sampling methods applied to the same eyes to one another or to a reference standard of corneal epithelial biopsy. We addressed this lack by comparing the microbiome from three conjunctival swabs with those of corneal epithelial biopsy. Methods Twelve eyes (11 patients) were swabbed by calcium alginate swab, cotton-tipped applicator, and Weck-Cel cellulose sponge before a corneal epithelial biopsy (48 samples). We then performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing and universal 16S rRNA gene real-time polymerase chain reaction. Negative/blank controls were used to eliminate contaminants. An analysis was performed to examine the concordance of the three swab types to corneal epithelial biopsy. The effect of patient age on the ocular microbiome as determined by epithelial biopsy was also examined. Results The ocular microbiome from corneal epithelial biopsies consisted of 31 genera with a relative abundance of 1% or more, including Weisella , Corynebacterium , and Pseudomonas. Of the three swab types, Weck-Cel differed the most from corneal biopsies based on beta-diversity analysis. Cotton swabs were unable to capture the Bacteroides population seen on epithelial biopsy. Therefore, calcium alginate swabs seemed to be the closest to epithelial biopsies. Older patients (≥65 years old) had higher alpha diversity ( P < 0.05) than younger patients. Differential abundance testing showed that there were 18 genera that were differentially abundant between the two age groups, including Streptococcus and eight members of the Proteobacteria phylum. Conclusions We demonstrate that ocular sampling method and patient age can greatly affect the outcome of sequencing-based analysis of the ocular microbiome. Translational Relevance By understanding the impact of different sampling methods on the results obtained from the ocular surface microbiome, future research on the topic will be more reproducible, leading to a better understanding of ocular surface microbiome in health and disease.

Characterization and Comparison of Ocular Surface Microbiome in Newborns

“…Our evidence showed, in agreement with other studies, that OSM was paucibacterial, but with a predominance of Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla [ 33 , 34 ]. Figure 1 shows a difference in the percentage of the Bacteroidetes group.…”

Metagenomic profiling of ocular surface microbiome changes in Demodex blepharitis patients

“…One of the limitations is the long duration of this study, and we did not collect sampling environment-negative controls, although we adopted strict environmental sterilization during each sample collection. Second, previous studies had revealed that the microbiota diversity on the ocular surface of healthy participants changes with age (Suzuki et al, 2020;Katzka et al, 2021). Participants' age ranged from 20 to 60 years in this study, and this age range may have affected the results.…”

Profiling of the Conjunctival Bacterial Microbiota Reveals the Feasibility of Utilizing a Microbiome-Based Machine Learning Model to Differentially Diagnose Microbial Keratitis and the Core Components of the Conjunctival Bacterial Interaction Network

“…A drop of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride eye drops was used for anesthesia before sampling. ( Ren et al., 2020 ) The superior palpebral conjunctiva, superior bulbar conjunctiva, inferior bulbar conjunctiva, inferior fornical conjunctiva, and inferior palpebral conjunctiva of the examined eye were rubbed lightly in sequence using one sterile cotton swab ( Katzka et al., 2021 ) (from the supply department of Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University according to T/CSBME013-2019 standard of China) soaked with oxybuprocaine hydrochloride eye drops. ( Ren et al., 2020 ) The meibomian orifices, eyelashes, and cornea were avoided.…”