“…Improving the caliber of the budgetary process through centralizing authority within political branches is widely thought to impose greater fiscal restraint and consistency due to enhanced political accountability, as well as circumvent collective action problems experienced in decentralized budgetary systems containing a weak executive (e.g., Hallerberg, Strauch, & Von Hagen, ; Tabellini & Persson, ). The melding of fiscal and managerial control with the president was not only advocated by the Progressive Reformers, but also emphasized more broadly in the early history of the Bureau of the Budget (BoB) (e.g., Berman, , p. 5; Dawes, , Preface, 2, 85; Fisher, , pp. 31–44).…”